Maintenance Timing Calculation for Consumable Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional maintenance planning relies on experience and guesswork, leading to a trade-off between maintenance costs and downtime, as it is difficult to accurately estimate the failure rates and optimal replacement times for consumable parts, resulting in excessive replacements or unexpected failures.

Innovation Solution

A maintenance system and method that calculates visit intervals and replacement intervals for consumable parts based on failure rate distributions derived from historical maintenance data, using a failure-rate-distribution calculating step, visit-interval calculating step, and replacement-interval calculating step, to determine the optimal timing for maintenance visits and replacements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If parts with high risk of failure are replaced before the end of life to reduce the risk of product failure, then reliability is improved, but maintenance cost increases due to excessive replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct availabilityVSAvoidmaintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of failure rate distributions and calculates optimal replacement intervals before actual maintenance actions are taken. By using historical maintenance data to predict when parts are likely to fail, the system schedules replacements just in time rather than prematurely, thus maintaining reliability while avoiding excessive replacement costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of replacement timing from fixed preventive intervals to dynamic intervals based on calculated failure rate distributions. By continuously analyzing historical data and adjusting replacement schedules based on actual part behavior patterns, the system optimizes the balance between reliability and maintenance cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If products are used to the end of life to decrease maintenance cost, then maintenance cost is reduced, but downtime increases leading to increased user loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance costVSAvoidproduct downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously collecting historical maintenance data and using it to calculate updated failure rate distributions. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from actual part performance and adjust future maintenance schedules, ensuring that products are replaced just before failure rather than waiting until end-of-life, thus minimizing downtime while controlling costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculation of optimal replacement timing based on failure rate distributions before actual failures occur. This allows proactive scheduling of maintenance activities at the optimal moment, avoiding both premature replacement and waiting until failure, thereby minimizing downtime loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If maintenance planning is based on experience and guesswork, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision of failure rates and optimal replacement times deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance planning simplicityVSAvoidfailure rate estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically collecting historical maintenance data, calculating failure rate distributions, and determining optimal replacement intervals without requiring manual expert analysis. This automated process maintains ease of operation while dramatically improving measurement precision through data-driven calculations rather than subjective judgment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If the number of consumable parts to be replaced increases, then reliability is improved, but calculation cost to determine optimal maintenance planning increases extremely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct availabilityVSAvoidcalculation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the maintenance planning problem by calculating failure rate distributions and optimal replacement intervals for each consumable part independently. This segmentation allows the system to handle multiple parts efficiently by processing them individually through the same analytical framework, avoiding the need for computationally expensive combinatorial optimization while still determining the best overall maintenance plan

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7474988B2Maintenance system and method and program therefor
Publication Date: 2009.01.06 KK TOSHIBA
  • US7474988B2 patent drawing
  • US7474988B2 patent drawing
  • US7474988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

To provide a technique of reducing the costs for maintenance work and also the downtime of products. There is provided a maintenance system that calculates a timing to make a visit for maintenance work for consumable parts of a machine to be maintained. The maintenance system includes: a visit-interval calculating section for calculating a visit interval to make a visit for maintenance work for each consumable part on the basis of a failure rate distribution; a replacement-interval calculating section for calculating a replacement interval to replace the consumable parts for each consumable part on the basis of the failure rate distribution; and a visit-timing calculating section for calculating a timing to actually visit the machine to be maintained on the basis of the visit interval calculated by the visit-interval calculating section and the replacement interval calculated by the replacement-interval calculating section.