Maize Inbred PHEMW Breeding for Uniformity and Stress Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current maize breeding techniques face challenges in combining desirable traits such as disease resistance, drought tolerance, and uniformity, which are essential for efficient crop production and mechanical harvesting.

Innovation Solution

Development of a novel maize variety, PHEMW, through a breeding process involving crossing inbred lines, self-pollination, and selection, resulting in a substantially homozygous line with improved traits such as resistance to various stresses and uniform plant characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional plant breeding methods are used to combine multiple desirable traits, then the complexity of the breeding process increases, but the uniformity and reliability of the resulting variety may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombination of desirable traitsVSAvoidbreeding process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The breeding process is divided into distinct generations (P1, P2, F1, F2, F3, F4) with specific selection criteria for each stage. This segmentation allows systematic combination of traits while maintaining control over complexity at each step, ultimately producing uniform F4 varieties with multiple desirable traits including disease resistance and stress tolerance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary action by performing multiple generations of inbreeding and selection before final variety establishment. The P1 and P2 generations are used to introgress desired traits, followed by systematic selection in F1-F4 generations to ensure uniformity. This preliminary multi-generational preparation resolves the contradiction by building trait combinations gradually while maintaining process control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple generations of inbreeding are performed to achieve uniformity, then the time required for variety development increases, but the reliability and uniformity of the final variety improve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of plant characteristicsVSAvoidtime to variety development
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The breeding program maintains continuous useful action through overlapping generations and parallel selection processes. Multiple families are advanced simultaneously through F1, F2, and F3 generations, with continuous selection for uniformity and desired traits. This continuous multi-family advancement approach achieves high reliability and uniformity while optimizing the time required compared to sequential single-family breeding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs partial action by selecting and advancing only the most promising families through each generation rather than maintaining all possible crosses. In the F3 and F4 generations, excessive action is used by evaluating multiple traits simultaneously (maturity, height, ear characteristics, disease resistance) and selecting families that exceed performance thresholds, thereby achieving reliable uniformity in a optimized timeframe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If strict selection criteria are applied to ensure uniformity, then the productivity of the breeding program decreases, but the manufacturing precision of the variety improves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of plant characteristicsVSAvoidbreeding program output
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The breeding program applies parameter changes by adjusting selection criteria at different generations. Early generations (F1-F2) use broader selection parameters to maintain productivity, while later generations (F3-F4) apply stricter parameters for uniformity. Specific parameters such as plant height tolerance (±6 inches), ear height variation (±6 inches), and maturity timing are systematically applied to balance precision requirements with breeding program productivity across different stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Different selection stringencies are applied to different traits and different generations. Local quality is achieved by applying strict uniformity requirements to critical traits (maturity, plant height, ear characteristics) while maintaining more flexible selection for secondary traits. This allows the breeding program to achieve manufacturing precision for key variety characteristics without excessively reducing overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8415545B1Maize variety inbred PHEMW
Publication Date: 2013.04.09 PIONEER HI BREED INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US8415545B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A novel maize variety designated PHEMW and seed, plants and plant parts thereof. Methods for producing a maize plant that comprise crossing maize variety PHEMW with another maize plant. Methods for producing a maize plant containing in its genetic material one or more traits introgressed into PHEMW through backcross conversion and/or transformation, and to the maize seed, plant and plant part produced thereby. Hybrid maize seed, plant or plant part produced by crossing the variety PHEMW or a locus conversion of PHEMW with another maize variety.