Flame Retardant Polymer Composition Using Maleic Anhydride Coupling Agent

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flame retardant polymer compositions face challenges in achieving a balance between good flame retardancy, processability, mechanical properties, and cost-effectiveness, particularly in passing the FIPEC test while maintaining extrudability and tensile strength, and often suffer from the use of halogen- and phosphorous-containing compounds or high amounts of inorganic fillers that deteriorate mechanical properties.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an ethylene copolymer with at least 0.6 wt.% maleic anhydride units as a coupling agent in a flame retardant polymer composition that includes uncoated aluminum hydroxide as the filler material, enhancing compatibility and distribution within the composition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If halogen-containing compounds are used as flame retardants, then flame retardancy is improved, but hazardous and corrosive gases are released upon burning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame retardancyVSAvoidhazardous and corrosive gases
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces halogen-containing compounds with hydrogen-containing inorganic fillers (Al(OH)3, Mg(OH)2) that release harmless water vapor instead of hazardous gases when decomposed during burning, converting a harmful flame retardant approach into a benign one while maintaining flame retardancy through endothermic decomposition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameter from halogen-based to hydrogen-based flame retardants, and optimizes the filler content parameter to 40-60 wt.% to achieve effective flame retardancy without excessive filler that would deteriorate mechanical properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If high amounts of inorganic fillers (50-60 wt. %) are used to improve flame retardancy, then flame retardancy is improved, but processability and mechanical properties deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame retardancyVSAvoidprocessability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces silane-modified polymers as intermediary coupling agents between inorganic fillers and polymer matrix, improving interfacial adhesion and compatibility, which allows high filler content (40-60 wt.%) to be used without severe deterioration of processability and mechanical properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite material system combining inorganic fillers (Al(OH)3, Mg(OH)2) with silane-modified polymers, where the silane modification provides both flame retardancy enhancement and improved interfacial bonding, resolving the contradiction between filler content and mechanical properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If high amounts of inorganic fillers (50-60 wt. %) are used to improve flame retardancy, then flame retardancy is improved, but mechanical properties deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame retardancyVSAvoidmechanical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The silane-modified polymer acts as a mediator that strengthens the interface between inorganic fillers and the polymer matrix through chemical bonding, preventing filler aggregation and maintaining mechanical integrity even at high filler loadings of 40-60 wt.%, thus preserving tensile strength and elongation properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The silane-modified composite structure creates a synergistic effect where the modified polymer matrix and inorganic fillers work together to maintain mechanical properties while achieving high flame retardancy, avoiding the mechanical property deterioration typical of simple filler composites

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves improved flame retardancy, meeting class D, C, or B2 requirements of the FIPEC test, while maintaining good mechanical properties and processability, and is cost-effective, with reduced or no halogen- and phosphorous-containing compounds, thus overcoming the limitations of prior art.

Implementation Method 1

The polar maleic anhydride units in the ethylene copolymer assure the compatibility between the polymer base resin and the uncoated inorganic filler material and thus improve the distribution of the latter in the final composition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolar interaction: Van der Waals Force

Implementation Method 2

hydrated and hydroxy compounds, which during burning decompose endothermically and deliberate inert gases at temperatures in the range of 200 to 600° C. Such inorganic fillers e.g. include Al(OH)3 and Mg(OH)2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEndothermic decomposition: Endothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentUS9105374B2Flame retardant polymer composition comprising an ethylene copolymer with maleic anhydride units as coupling agent
Publication Date: 2015.08.11 BOREALIS AG

AI summary

The present invention relates to a flame retardant polymer composition comprising (A) an ethylene copolymer comprising alkyl acrylate comonomer units, (B) uncoated aluminum hydroxide as inorganic filler, and (C) an ethylene copolymer comprising maleic anhydride units in an amount of 0.6 to 5 wt. %, an article comprising such a composition, the use of such a composition for producing a layer in a wire or cable and the use of an ethylene copolymer comprising maleic anhydride units for producing a wire or cable fulfilling the requirements of class D of the FIPEC test according to prEN 50399:2007./.