Malformed Blocked Airspace Resolution for Dynamic Flight Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current airspace management systems lack real-time updates for blocked airspace, leading to inefficient flight planning that results in longer flight paths, higher fuel consumption, and increased costs due to the overcompensation of avoiding potentially unused restricted areas.

Innovation Solution

A cross-domain guard system facilitates secure communication between classified and unclassified systems to provide real-time updates on blocked airspace status, allowing for dynamic flight path adjustments using a central platform that manages and updates blocked airspace data, and identifies potential sub-regions for optimal route planning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If operators proactively adjust flight paths to avoid blocked airspace, then flight safety and compliance are improved, but flight distance and fuel consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static blocked airspace data to dynamic, real-time updates on blocked airspace status. Flight paths can be dynamically adjusted based on current airspace availability, allowing operators to optimize routes while maintaining safety compliance. The central platform continuously updates airspace status, enabling flexible route planning that adapts to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the central platform provides real-time information about blocked airspace status to flight planning systems. This feedback loop allows operators to make informed decisions about flight path adjustments, avoiding unnecessary detours around airspace that is currently available for use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If entities request large time periods of blocked airspace usage, then operational flexibility is improved, but flight efficiency for other operators deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidflight efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments blocked airspace into specific sub-regions and time periods. Instead of blocking entire airspace regions for extended periods, the system allows granular control where only specific sub-regions are blocked when needed, while other areas remain available for commercial use. This segmentation enables multiple operations to coexist efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides real-time updates on blocked airspace status, allowing dynamic adjustment of flight paths based on current airspace availability. When blocked airspace becomes available, the system notifies operators, enabling them to adjust routes in real-time and improve flight efficiency without compromising the operational flexibility of entities that need to reserve airspace.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If manual or semi-automated processes are used for airspace reservation, then system complexity is reduced, but data processing speed and real-time capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoiddata processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a central platform as an intermediary that automates airspace management functions. This platform receives blocked airspace status from classified systems, processes the data, and distributes it to authorized users. The intermediary handles real-time data processing and distribution, enabling fast updates without requiring complex modifications to existing manual reservation systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual or semi-automated airspace reservation processes with automated electronic data processing. The central platform automatically receives, processes, and distributes blocked airspace status information in real-time, eliminating the need for manual data entry and processing while maintaining system accessibility for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If blocked airspace data is not updated frequently, then system simplicity is maintained, but flight path accuracy and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidflight path accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the central platform continuously receives blocked airspace status updates and distributes them to flight planning systems. This real-time feedback ensures that flight path planning is based on current airspace availability, improving accuracy without requiring complex system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The central platform acts as an intermediary that handles the complexity of real-time data processing and distribution. It receives blocked airspace status from classified systems, processes the information, and makes it available to authorized users through a standardized interface, maintaining system simplicity while enabling frequent updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12462695B2Conflict resolution for malformed blocked airspace designations
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 GLASS AVIATION HOLDINGS INC
  • US12462695B2 patent drawing
  • US12462695B2 patent drawing
  • US12462695B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some aspects, the techniques described herein relate to a method including: receiving, by a processor, blocked airspace description data; converting, by a processor, a flight path into a plurality of latitude-longitude pairs; expanding, by the processor, the blocked airspace description data into a plurality of potential blocked airspace sub-regions, each of the potential blocked airspace sub-regions including a geographical area; identifying, by the processor, a subset of the potential blocked airspace sub-regions based on comparing flight steps between respective latitude-longitude pairs and geographic areas of the potential blocked airspace sub-regions; and using, by the processor, the subset of the potential block airspace sub-regions to adjust the flight path.