Malicious Tool Action Detection via ML Anomaly Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anti-malware tools struggle to detect and protect against malicious actions performed by legitimate computing-system tools, as these tools often have high reputation scores and are critical for benign actions, making it difficult to quarantine or delete them.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that identifies computing-system tools capable of both benign and malicious actions, records their actions over time, analyzes them using machine learning methods like autoencoders and radial classifiers to determine anomalies, and initiates security actions when malicious behavior is detected.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional anti-malware tools quarantine or delete applications, then malware detection effectiveness is improved, but legitimate system tools cannot be protected against malicious use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalware detection effectivenessVSAvoidability to handle dual-purpose tools
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the analysis from detecting the tool itself to detecting specific actions performed by the tool. Instead of treating the entire application as malicious or benign, the system analyzes individual actions separately, allowing legitimate system tools to be preserved while their malicious actions are detected and blocked.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its detection approach based on the specific action being performed. By using machine learning to analyze action patterns and deviations, the system adapts its detection sensitivity for different actions, allowing benign actions to proceed while blocking malicious ones, rather than using a static quarantine approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If system tools are preserved for benign actions, then system functionality is maintained, but malicious actions by these tools go undetected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidmalicious actions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where actions are monitored, analyzed, and used to update detection models. The machine learning components continuously learn from observed action patterns, allowing the system to maintain system functionality while progressively improving detection of malicious actions through adaptive feedback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary analysis layer between the system tool and its actions. This intermediary uses machine learning to evaluate whether each action is benign or malicious, allowing legitimate system tools to operate while blocking harmful actions, thus mediating between system functionality and security protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If machine learning analysis is applied to all actions, then detection accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaction classification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies machine learning analysis selectively rather than uniformly to all actions. By focusing computational resources on actions that exhibit suspicious patterns or deviations from normal behavior, the system achieves high detection accuracy while minimizing unnecessary processing time for clearly benign actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11288369B1Systems and methods for detecting and protecting against malicious use of legitimate computing-system tools
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 CA TECH INC
  • US11288369B1 patent drawing
  • US11288369B1 patent drawing
  • US11288369B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for detecting and protecting against malicious use of legitimate computing-system tools may include (i) identifying a computing-system tool that can perform benign actions and malicious actions on a computing system, (ii) creating a set of recorded actions by recording actions performed by the computing-system tool on the computing system over a predetermined period of time, (iii) analyzing the set of recorded actions via a machine learning method that, for each action in the set of recorded actions, determines whether the action is anomalous compared to other actions in the set, (iv) classifying an action in the set of recorded actions as malicious based at least in part on determining that the action is anomalous, and (v) initiating, in response to classifying the action as malicious, a security action related to the action. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.