Security Patch Deployment Through Malicious Traffic Anomaly Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current malware and cyberattack detection techniques are retroactive, failing to utilize physical and digital impressions of cyberattacks to identify and deploy appropriate security patches, compromising user device security and information integrity.

Innovation Solution

A system that detects physical and digital impressions of cyberattacks, uses machine learning to identify a security patch, and proactively deploys it before an attack occurs, incorporating deep learning for protocol simulations and firewall policies to block malicious traffic.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If retroactive malware and cyberattack detection techniques are used, then detection capability is provided, but security response timing deteriorates because attacks are detected only after damage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity response timingVSAvoidtime delay between attack and detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively deploying security patches before cyberattacks occur. The patch management system continuously monitors for vulnerabilities, retrieves appropriate security patches, and installs them in advance, transforming the reactive security model into a proactive one that prevents attacks before they can cause damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by using firewall policies and intrusion prevention rules to block malicious traffic before it can execute attacks. The system proactively identifies potential threat patterns and implements countermeasures in advance, creating a defensive barrier that prevents cyberattacks rather than merely detecting them after occurrence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Measurement precision

If physical and digital impressions of cyberattacks are utilized, then detection accuracy improves, but system complexity increases due to multiple detection dimensions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex detection task into distinct components: physical impression detection (CPU usage, memory consumption, disk I/O, network traffic patterns) and digital impression detection (system logs, process behaviors, file modifications). Each component is monitored and analyzed separately, then integrated to form a comprehensive detection decision, making the complex system more manageable and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal detection framework that handles multiple types of cyberattacks through a common architecture. The same monitoring infrastructure collects physical and digital impressions across various attack scenarios, and the unified analysis engine processes different attack patterns using consistent methods, reducing overall system complexity despite the multi-dimensional detection approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If security patches are proactively deployed before attacks occur, then security protection improves, but resource consumption increases due to continuous monitoring and patch management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protection levelVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action by scheduling regular vulnerability assessments, patch retrievals, and security updates rather than continuously monitoring all aspects of system security. The patch management system operates in cycles: scanning for vulnerabilities, evaluating patch necessity, retrieving patches during low-activity periods, and scheduling installations to minimize disruption, thereby reducing overall resource consumption while maintaining proactive security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies self-service by enabling automated vulnerability scanning, patch evaluation, and deployment processes that require minimal human intervention. The patch management system automatically identifies security gaps, retrieves appropriate patches from update servers, and installs them based on predefined policies, reducing the manual resource overhead while maintaining high security protection levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12463998B2Security patch deployment in response to detecting malicious network traffic
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US12463998B2 patent drawing
  • US12463998B2 patent drawing
  • US12463998B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for detecting and addressing security threats is disclosed. The system detects incoming network traffic to a computing device. The system detects physical and digital effects of the network traffic on the computing device. The system determines that the network traffic is causing a first set of anomalies based on the physical and digital effects of the network traffic. The system compares the first set of anomalies with a second set of anomalies associated with previously known malicious network traffic. If the system determines that more than a threshold percentage of the first set of anomalies corresponds to counterpart anomalies from the second set of anomalies, the system determines that the network traffic corresponds to the malicious network traffic. The system communicates a security patch associated with the second set of anomalies and instructions that cause the security patch to be executed to the computing device.