Dynamic Malingering Detection Test Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current neuropsychological assessments for detecting malingering are inefficient and time-consuming, as they require extensive test batteries that can only be analyzed retrospectively, leading to resource wastage and complexity in identifying malingering behavior.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that utilize a memory unit to store models of physical and mental function tests, allowing a processing unit to dynamically select and adapt a set of tests based on user requirements for detecting malingering, including the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to analyze results and adjust test difficulty levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a full neuropsychological assessment battery of 30-40 tests is administered to detect malingering, then the reliability of malingering detection is improved, but the time required and resource consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalingering detection reliabilityVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the full 30-40 test battery into smaller subsets of tests. Instead of administering all tests to every subject, the system divides tests into groups and selectively administers only the necessary subsets based on initial screening results and user requirements, thereby reducing time while maintaining detection reliability through targeted test selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adaptability in test battery selection. The system can dynamically adjust which tests are administered based on real-time assessment needs, user requirements, and preliminary results. This dynamic approach allows the assessment to be tailored to each subject's specific risk profile rather than applying a static full battery to all subjects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If detailed analysis of individual test responses is performed to identify malingering, then the precision of malingering detection is improved, but the complexity of the assessment process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalingering detection precisionVSAvoidassessment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-processing and analyzing test responses as they are being administered, rather than waiting for complete battery administration. The system performs preliminary analysis of individual test responses to identify patterns indicating malingering, allowing early detection without requiring completion of the entire test battery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational layer that automatically analyzes test responses using algorithms to identify malingering patterns. This intermediary system bridges the gap between raw test responses and clinical interpretation, reducing the complexity burden on clinicians while maintaining high detection precision through automated pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the test battery is adapted to collect more evidence of malingering, then the reliability of detection is improved, but the productivity of the assessment process decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalingering detection reliabilityVSAvoidassessment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors test responses and adjusts the assessment plan in real-time. When malingering is detected or suspected, the system provides feedback to automatically adapt the test battery, selecting additional targeted tests to confirm or refute the suspicion. This feedback-driven adaptation maintains high detection reliability while avoiding unnecessary administration of the full test battery to all subjects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11786156B2Method and apparatus for use in detecting malingering by a first subject in tests of physical and/or mental function of the first subject
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US11786156B2 patent drawing
  • US11786156B2 patent drawing
  • US11786156B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an aspect, there is provided an apparatus for use in detecting malingering by a first subject in a test of physical and/or mental function of the first subject. The apparatus comprises a memory unit configured to store a plurality of models, each model identifies a respective set of physical and/or mental function tests from a plurality of different physical and/or mental function tests that can be used to detect malingering in a subject and that meets one or more possible user requirements for detecting malingering; and a processing unit configured to receive a user input from a user of the apparatus, the received user input indicating a user requirement for detecting malingering in the first subject; following receipt of an indication that the first subject may be malingering in one or more physical and/or mental function tests, retrieve, from the memory unit, the identity of a first set of physical and/or mental function tests for a model that meets the indicated user requirement; and output a control signal to a function testing device indicating the retrieved identity of the first set of physical and/or mental function tests such that the testing device provides the identified first set of physical and/or mental function tests to the first subject completion for completion.