Malleable Substrate Sculpting for 3D Image Depth

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for presenting two-dimensional works in a three-dimensional manner often disrupt the continuity of the image with multiple layers and edges, lacking the realistic depth and elevation that a single, molded image can achieve.

Innovation Solution

A two-dimensional work is adhered to a thin, malleable substrate, allowing it to be sculpted into a non-planar shape that enhances realism by altering foreground and background elevations, and then secured within a cavity to maintain the new form while appearing flat from a distance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If multiple printed copies are cut into different sizes and layered at uniform and not uniform elevations, then three-dimensional realism is enhanced, but the continuity of the image is broken and visible layers and edges are created

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethree-dimensional realismVSAvoidimage continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the single print into multiple sections or zones that are independently molded to different elevations, allowing three-dimensional effect while maintaining overall image continuity. The print is segmented by depth zones rather than physical cuts, resolving the contradiction between 3D realism and image integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a flat two-dimensional print to a three-dimensional form by molding the print to different elevations. This dimensional transformation creates depth and realism while the print remains a single continuous piece, avoiding the layering problem of prior art.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of information

If a single print is molded into a non-planar shape, then image continuity is maintained, but the print requires anchoring to multiple backing materials which creates visible layers and edges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage continuityVSAvoidmultiple backing materials
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the multiple backing materials from the construction process. Instead of anchoring the print to several different backers at different elevations, the single molded print is secured to a flat backing, eliminating the visible layer edges while maintaining image continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies local quality by molding only specific portions of the print to different elevations rather than requiring multiple backing materials throughout. This localized molding approach maintains simplicity while achieving three-dimensional effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Shape

If foreground and background elements are positioned at different elevations, then depth perception is enhanced, but the structure becomes more complex requiring multiple backing materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth perceptionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the foreground and background elements into a single molded print structure. Both elements are positioned at different elevations through differential molding of the same print, eliminating the need for multiple separate backing materials and reducing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses dimensional transformation to achieve depth perception. By molding the single print to vary elevations across its surface, foreground and background elements are positioned at different heights without requiring complex multi-layer construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method creates a realistic three-dimensional appearance without visible layers or edges, allowing the image to appear uncannily three-dimensional without stereographic glasses, enhancing the depth and realism of the subject matter.

Implementation Method 1

a moldable sheet material is selected, crumpled in a haphazard or irregular manner, and then uncrumpled

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasticity: Plasticity

Implementation Method 2

An adhesive is applied to the uncrumpled sheet. While moistened by the adhesive, said moldable sheet is worked by hand against a rigid base panel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS10059143B2Method for creating a three-dimensional effect from a two-dimensional work
Publication Date: 2018.08.28 FALCK CHRISTOPHER ERNEST
  • US10059143B2 patent drawing
  • US10059143B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This is a method to alter a two-dimensional work into a three-dimensional version of that work, and then disguise it as a common two-dimensional work. The two-dimensional work must be malleable or made malleable by adhering a malleable backing, such as sheet metal, such that it retains the new shape when bent. Foreground elements of the work's subject matter are then moved physically closer to the viewer than background elements by sculpting techniques like bending, thus making the original work now three-dimensional. The work is then enclosed in a structure like a box with a window allowing the work to be seen. The window obscures the edges of the work such that viewing the art from multiple angles doesn't easily reveal the edge of work.