Malware Detection System Configuration Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

On-premises malware detection systems often become misconfigured over time due to dynamic network traffic patterns and changing threat landscapes, leading to under or over-utilization, which can result in inadequate cyberattack detection and increased risk, largely due to the lack of frequent reconfiguration due to high costs and scarcity of skilled technicians.

Innovation Solution

A system configuration optimization engine that remotely analyzes meta-information from malware detection systems to determine their performance levels and adjusts configuration parameters to optimize their operation, using machine learning models to identify misconfigurations and recommend modifications, with the ability to automatically update configurations or require administrator approval.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If malware detection systems are frequently reconfigured to adapt to changing network traffic patterns and threat landscapes, then detection effectiveness and performance optimization are improved, but operational costs and complexity increase due to requiring skilled technicians

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection effectivenessVSAvoidconfiguration management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated configuration management. The malware detection system automatically monitors its own performance metrics, compares them against optimal thresholds, and adjusts configuration parameters without human intervention. This eliminates the need for skilled technicians to perform frequent reconfigurations while maintaining high detection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where performance metrics from the malware detection system are collected, analyzed, and used to automatically adjust configuration parameters. The system monitors detection rates, false positives, and resource utilization, then feeds this information back to optimize configuration in real-time, ensuring adaptability to changing threats without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If malware detection systems are initially configured with factory settings or user-configurable parameters, then ease of installation is improved, but long-term operational efficiency deteriorates due to misconfiguration over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static factory configurations to dynamic, adaptive configuration management. Configuration parameters are no longer fixed but continuously adjusted based on real-time performance monitoring and changing network conditions. This allows the system to maintain optimal operational efficiency throughout its lifecycle while retaining simple initial installation through automated adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If skilled technicians are deployed to manually reconfigure malware detection systems, then configuration accuracy is improved, but service availability and cost increase due to technician scarcity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidservice availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical configuration operations with automated electronic systems. Instead of technicians physically accessing and reconfiguring devices, an automated configuration management system performs all adjustments remotely and automatically. This maintains configuration accuracy through algorithmic optimization while dramatically improving service availability and reducing costs by eliminating dependency on scarce skilled technicians.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10826931B1System and method for predicting and mitigating cybersecurity system misconfigurations
Publication Date: 2020.11.03 MAGENTA SECURITY HOLDINGS LLC
  • US10826931B1 patent drawing
  • US10826931B1 patent drawing
  • US10826931B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computerized method for reconfiguring one or more malware detection systems each performing cybersecurity analyses on incoming data is described. The method involves receiving meta-information including metrics associated with a malware detection system. Based on the meta-information, a determination is made whether the malware detection system is operating at an optimal performance level. If not, results produced by conducting behavior analyses predicting operability of the malware detection system are determined and the results are provided as feedback to the malware detection system to update one or more configuration parameter values thereof.