Malware Detection via Memory and Thread Visibility Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional malware detection techniques struggle to accurately differentiate between malicious software and legitimate software due to similarities in their execution behaviors, leading to high false alarm or missed detection rates.

Innovation Solution

A malware detection system that monitors memory locations allocated by the operating system and thread initialization to identify suspicious activities, determining visibility characteristics that indicate evasion attempts, thereby distinguishing malicious software from legitimate software.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional malware detection techniques monitor software execution behaviors, then malware can be detected, but false alarm rates and missed detection rates increase due to similarities between malicious and legitimate software behaviors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalware detection accuracyVSAvoiddifferentiation precision between malicious and legitimate software
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the malware detection process into multiple independent monitoring components: memory allocation monitoring, thread initialization monitoring, and visibility characteristic analysis. Each component focuses on a specific aspect of process behavior, allowing the system to accumulate evidence across multiple dimensions rather than relying on a single behavioral indicator, thereby improving differentiation precision while maintaining detection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces visibility characteristics as a new dimension for analysis, examining whether processes attempt to hide their execution through techniques like process injection or memory manipulation. This additional dimensional perspective allows the system to distinguish malicious software from legitimate software even when their basic execution behaviors overlap, resolving the contradiction between detection reliability and differentiation precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the system monitors multiple threads and memory locations to improve detection accuracy, then malware identification improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalware identification precisionVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary monitoring and analysis of process behaviors, maintaining records of memory allocations and thread initializations before making detection decisions. By preparing and analyzing multiple indicators in advance through structured data collection, the system achieves high identification precision without requiring complex real-time analysis, thus managing system complexity effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces visibility characteristics as an intermediary layer between raw process behavior data and final malware classification. This intermediary analysis layer synthesizes information from multiple threads and memory locations into standardized indicators, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining high detection precision through systematic evidence aggregation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the system analyzes visibility characteristics to detect evasion attempts, then malware detection reliability improves, but the time required for analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalware detection reliabilityVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a staged analysis approach where visibility characteristics are evaluated selectively based on initial monitoring results. Not all processes undergo complete visibility characteristic analysis—only those exhibiting suspicious patterns from preliminary monitoring. This partial action approach maintains high detection reliability for malicious software while reducing unnecessary analysis time for legitimate processes, effectively balancing reliability and time consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250342249A1Techniques for detecting malicious software in a computing asset
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 RAPID7 INC
  • US20250342249A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342249A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342249A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments provide techniques for detecting presence of malicious software in a computing asset. The techniques identify, from among a plurality of memory locations allocated for use by a process managed by an operating system (OS) associated with the computing asset, memory location(s) to monitor in furtherance of detecting presence of malicious software in the computing asset, monitor threads initialized by the process using the identified memory location(s) to determine a number of threads so initialized, identify value(s) for visibility characteristic(s) of the process indicative of whether the process is attempting to evade detection of its execution on the computing asset, and determine whether the process is a malicious software process based on the number of threads and the value(s) for the visibility characteristic(s).