Managed-Lane Traffic Flow Prediction With Adaptive Tolling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current traffic optimization technologies fail to utilize real-time data and adaptive algorithms, leading to suboptimal decisions and inefficiencies in managing mixed traffic conditions, including human-driven and connected-automated vehicles, and do not leverage the communication capabilities of connected-automated vehicles for personalized incentivization.

Innovation Solution

A traffic optimization system integrating real-time sensors, machine learning models, and adaptive algorithms to predict future traffic conditions, communicate with connected-automated vehicles, and adjust toll rates dynamically based on vehicle behavior patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If real-time sensors and machine learning models are integrated to predict future traffic conditions, then traffic flow optimization and congestion reduction are improved, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic flow efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the roadway into multiple segments with managed lanes and non-managed lanes, allowing independent analysis and control of different traffic zones. This segmentation enables the machine learning model to process traffic conditions in manageable units rather than as a monolithic system, improving computational efficiency while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model predicts future traffic conditions before they actually occur, allowing the system to proactively adjust toll rates and traffic management strategies. This preliminary action enables optimization of traffic flow before congestion develops, rather than reacting to established problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If dynamic toll rates are implemented based on predicted future conditions, then travel time consistency and traffic flow stability are improved, but computational load and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic flow stabilityVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system updates toll rates periodically based on predicted traffic conditions rather than continuously adjusting them in real-time. This periodic adjustment strategy maintains traffic flow stability while reducing computational energy consumption compared to continuous optimization approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Measurement precision

If connected-automated vehicles are equipped with communication connectivity for real-time data exchange, then traffic information accuracy and coordination capability are improved, but communication infrastructure complexity and data security requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic information accuracyVSAvoidcommunication infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary communication infrastructure that mediates between connected-automated vehicles and the central traffic management system. This intermediary layer simplifies the communication architecture by providing standardized protocols and data formats, reducing the complexity that would otherwise exist in direct peer-to-peer communication between numerous vehicles and central systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If retroactive analysis of customer behavior is replaced with real-time communication and reinforcement learning, then incentivization effectiveness and managed lane usage optimization are improved, but real-time data processing requirements and algorithm complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincentivization adaptabilityVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback loops where reinforcement learning algorithms continuously analyze vehicle responses to toll rate adjustments and dynamically optimize incentivization strategies. This feedback mechanism replaces retroactive analysis by providing immediate learning from actual driver behavior, enabling adaptive optimization of managed lane usage while managing algorithmic complexity through iterative improvement approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12451003B1Systems and methods for optimizing traffic flow based on future roadway conditions
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 CINTRA US SERVICES LLC
  • US12451003B1 patent drawing
  • US12451003B1 patent drawing
  • US12451003B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosed technology relate to a system and methods for optimizing traffic flow along a roadway. The systems receive, from a connected-automated vehicle (CAV), a request for a travel time along a roadway having a managed lane and a general purpose lane. The system determines real-time traffic data, and using a trained machine learning model, predicts future traffic data along the roadway, determines a time saved by using the managed lane, communicates with the CAV, receives an acknowledgement that the vehicle will use the managed lane, and updates the predicted traffic data. Segment agents may be responsible for discrete segments of the roadway and may communicate with a coordination agent to result in a multi-agent reinforced traffic machine learning system. The system provides a mobility service to CAVs by implementing a reinforcement learning process to understand CAV behavior to optimize and maintain the service level along a roadway.