Management Computer Anomaly Rate Evaluation for Cloud Resource Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional monitoring methods fail to differentiate between performance issues caused by system resource problems and changes in usage characteristics in cloud environments, leading to increased administrator workload and delayed corrective actions.

Innovation Solution

A management computer system that calculates anomaly rates for both operation performance and usage characteristics, allowing for proper evaluation and notification of operational status, thereby distinguishing between resource issues and usage changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional monitoring methods are used to detect performance abnormalities, then abnormalities can be detected when performance indices fall outside reference ranges, but the administrator's workload increases and prompt measures cannot be taken because the cause cannot be differentiated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality detection accuracyVSAvoidadministrator workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the abnormality detection process into two independent evaluation dimensions: operation performance anomaly rate and usage characteristic anomaly rate. This segmentation allows the system to separately analyze whether abnormalities stem from system resource issues or usage pattern changes, thereby reducing administrator workload while maintaining detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces usage characteristic anomaly rate as an intermediary metric that mediates between raw performance data and administrator judgment. By comparing operation performance anomalies against usage characteristic anomalies, the system automatically determines the root cause category, eliminating the need for administrators to manually investigate and differentiate causes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If monitoring only operation performance indices is performed, then system resource problems can be detected, but changes in usage characteristic cannot be distinguished leading to false abnormality detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidusage characteristic information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges operation performance monitoring with usage characteristic monitoring into a unified evaluation framework. By combining these two monitoring dimensions and comparing their anomaly rates, the system achieves reliable performance monitoring while preserving usage characteristic information, thereby eliminating false positives caused by legitimate usage changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the monitoring parameter from solely operation performance indices to a dual-parameter system including both operation performance indices and usage characteristic indices. This parameter expansion enables the system to distinguish between genuine performance degradation and acceptable usage variations, improving monitoring reliability without losing usage information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual analysis is performed to determine whether performance issues are caused by system problems or usage changes, then accurate cause identification can be achieved, but the time required for corrective action increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecause identification accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service automation where the monitoring system automatically determines the cause category by comparing anomaly rates without requiring administrator intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously evaluating whether abnormalities stem from system issues or usage changes, thereby maintaining high cause identification accuracy while eliminating the time loss associated with manual analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback mechanism where the comparison results between operation performance anomaly rate and usage characteristic anomaly rate automatically feed into the cause determination logic. This closed-loop feedback system enables real-time automated cause identification, achieving both high accuracy and rapid response without administrator involvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10909016B2Management computer and method of managing computer to be managed
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 HITACHI LTD
  • US10909016B2 patent drawing
  • US10909016B2 patent drawing
  • US10909016B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a system where resources are used in a varying manner, when performances are monitored based on detected past behavior when the system was operating normally, if performance behavior is detected that is different, it is difficult to determine whether the detected performance behavior results from resources being used differently than when the system was operating normally. According to the present invention, monitoring accuracy is improved by determining whether performance behavior results from change in characteristics relating to the usage of the system by using means for measuring performances when the system is in operation and detecting a performance different from when the system was operating normally, means for measuring characteristics relating to the usage of the system and detecting whether the characteristics are different from when the system was operating normally, and means for comparing performance information with characteristic information relating to the usage of the system.