Mandible Prosthesis Serpentine Mounts Stress Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mandible reconstruction methods, such as the fibula flap procedure and 3D printed metal prostheses, fail to adequately match the size and geometry of mandibular defects, leading to severe facial defects and inability to withstand dental implant surgery due to stress concentration issues.

Innovation Solution

A reconstruction prosthesis featuring a main section connected via serpentine structures to mount sections, allowing for flexible placement and cushioning to absorb pressure, reducing stress concentration and facilitating integration with osseous tissue.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional metal mandibular prosthesis is used, then the prosthesis can be manufactured to match the mandibular defects geometry, but the prosthesis cannot distribute pressure and results in stress concentration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching mandibular defects geometryVSAvoidpressure distribution ability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a flexible polymer coating layer over the rigid metal prosthesis. This flexible shell absorbs and distributes occlusal forces, preventing stress concentration while maintaining the precise geometric fit of the underlying metal structure to the mandibular defects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure combining rigid metal (for geometric precision and structural support) with flexible polymer material (for pressure distribution and stress absorption). This composite approach resolves the contradiction between manufacturing precision and strength/pressure distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If fibula flap procedure is used, then bone tissue can be harvested to rebuild mandibular structures, but the fibula fragments do not match the mandibular defects size and geometry

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone tissue availabilityVSAvoidmatching mandibular defects geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses 3D scanning and digital modeling to create an exact copy or replica of the patient's specific mandibular defects geometry. This digital template guides the fabrication of the custom prosthesis, ensuring precise geometric matching that cannot be achieved with harvested fibula fragments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from using biologically harvested tissue with fixed geometric parameters to manufacturing a prosthesis where all geometric parameters can be precisely controlled and customized to match the patient's specific defects through digital design and additive manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If rigid metal prosthesis is used, then the prosthesis can provide structural support, but the prosthesis deforms or collapses under stress concentration during dental implant surgery or occlusion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural support capabilityVSAvoidresistance to deformation under load
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible polymer coating acts as a protective shell that absorbs impact forces and prevents stress concentration on the rigid metal structure, thereby preventing deformation and collapse during high-load activities like dental implant surgery or chewing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies a cushioning layer beforehand on the rigid metal prosthesis to preemptively absorb and distribute forces before they can concentrate on weak points of the metal structure, preventing deformation before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The prosthesis effectively matches mandibular defects, reduces stress concentration, and enhances the ability to withstand dental implant surgery by using serpentine structures as a cushion, improving the reconstruction outcome and patient's facial appearance.

Implementation Method 1

When the at least one serpentine structure is deformed by force, the relative position of the main section and the at least one mount section is changed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11337816B2Reconstruction prosthesis
Publication Date: 2022.05.24 IND TECH RES INST
  • US11337816B2 patent drawing
  • US11337816B2 patent drawing
  • US11337816B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a reconstruction prosthesis including a main section, at least one serpentine structure, and at least one mount section. The at least one serpentine structure is connected to one end of the main section. The at least one mount section is connected to the main section via the at least one serpentine structure. The at least one mount section is configured to be connected to osseous tissue. When the at least one serpentine structure is deformed by force, the relative position of the main section and the at least one mount section is changed.