Mandrel Cupping Assembly Cam Track Actuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional web rewinding machines face issues with mandrel vibration and wobble during loading and unloading, leading to inefficient core attachment and potential damage to the chuck arm mechanism, requiring complex and numerous moving parts for operation.

Innovation Solution

A simplified mandrel cupping assembly with a hold-open and hold-closed cam track system, utilizing a single actuator to rotate cupping arms independently, allowing for reliable engagement and disengagement of mandrel cups, reducing complexity and maintenance needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional mandrel support mechanisms are used with multiple moving parts, then the mandrels can be supported during winding, but the complexity of the device increases and maintenance needs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemandrel support stabilityVSAvoidnumber of moving parts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mandrel support system is segmented into discrete cupping arms, each independently controllable. Each cupping arm can be individually engaged or disengaged from its associated mandrel, allowing selective support where needed rather than requiring a complex continuous support mechanism throughout the entire mandrel length

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cupping arms are made dynamically controllable through actuators that can engage or disengage them from the mandrels based on operational requirements. During winding operations, the cupping arms are engaged to provide support; during loading and unloading operations, they are disengaged to allow free access to the mandrel ends

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If chuck arms are engaged with mandrels during loading and unloading, then mandrel stability is improved, but the ability to load and unload cores efficiently is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemandrel stabilityVSAvoidcore loading and unloading efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cupping arms are designed with dynamic engagement and disengagement capabilities through actuators. During loading and unloading operations, the cupping arms are disengaged from the mandrels to allow free axial movement of cores. During winding operations, the cupping arms are engaged to provide mandrel support and stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cupping arms undergo periodic engagement and disengagement cycles synchronized with the operational phases of the mandrel. They are disengaged during loading/unloading phases and engaged during winding phases, creating a rhythmic pattern that matches the operational requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If complex mandrel cupping mechanisms are used, then mandrel support is reliable, but the risk of mechanism damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemandrel support reliabilityVSAvoidrisk of mechanism damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The support mechanism is divided into separate, modular cupping arms that can be independently controlled. This segmentation reduces the complexity of any single mechanism and allows individual arms to be engaged or disengaged based on operational needs, reducing the risk of damage to the entire system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The actuators that control the cupping arms are positioned and configured to ensure smooth engagement and disengagement before critical operations begin. This preliminary positioning prevents sudden impacts or forced engagements that could damage the mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the stability of mandrel ends during operation, facilitating easier core loading and unloading, reducing the risk of damage and improving overall machine efficiency with fewer moving parts, allowing for higher turn-over rates and reduced maintenance costs.

Implementation Method 1

A simplified mandrel cupping assembly with a hold-open and hold-closed cam track system, utilizing a single actuator to rotate cupping arms independently

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Data Source

PatentUS8783598B2Web rewinding apparatus
Publication Date: 2014.07.22 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • US8783598B2 patent drawing
  • US8783598B2 patent drawing
  • US8783598B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A web rewinding apparatus comprising a turret winder and a mandrel cupping assembly is disclosed. The turret winder has a rotatably driven turret supporting a plurality of rotatably driven mandrels capable of engaging cores upon which a web material is convolutely wound thereabout. The mandrel cupping assembly has a plurality of cupping arms each cooperatively associated with one of the plurality of mandrels and having a mandrel cup for releaseably engaging the unsupported ends of the cooperatively associated mandrel. The mandrel cupping assembly has a cupping arm support having a hold-open cam track and a hold-closed cam track. Each cupping arm is carried in a radial path while disposed in either of the hold-open cam track or said hold-closed cam track. A first actuator disposes the cupping arm from the hold-open cam track to the hold-closed cam track.