Mandrel Cupping Assembly for Web Rewinding Vibration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional web rewinding machines face issues with mandrel vibration and wobble during loading and unloading, leading to inefficient core attachment and potential damage to the chuck arm mechanism, requiring complex and numerous moving parts for operation.

Innovation Solution

A simplified mandrel cupping assembly with fewer moving parts, utilizing a turret system where the mandrel cup is rotated independently with its respective mandrel, and a dual-actuator system for engaging and disengaging cupping arms to support and release the mandrel ends, allowing for easier core loading and unloading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional mandrel cupping assembly with multiple moving parts is used to support mandrels, then the mandrels can be supported during winding, but the complexity of the device increases and maintenance needs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemandrel support reliabilityVSAvoidcupping assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mandrel cupping assembly is divided into separate functional components: a mandrel cup that rotates independently with the mandrel, and a stationary actuator mechanism. This segmentation allows the cup to follow the mandrel's motion while the actuator remains fixed, reducing the complexity of moving parts while maintaining support reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the mandrel support function from the traditional multi-component cupping assembly and implements it through a simplified mechanism where the mandrel cup rotates independently. This extraction eliminates the need for complex linkages and multiple actuators, reducing device complexity while preserving the essential support function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Stability of the object's composition

If the mandrel is supported throughout the entire rotation cycle, then vibration and wobble are minimized, but core loading and unloading operations become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemandrel stabilityVSAvoidcore loading and unloading ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The mandrel cup is designed to be dynamically controllable, transitioning between an engaged position (providing support during winding) and a disengaged position (allowing core loading and unloading). The actuator mechanism enables smooth transitions between these states, providing stability when needed while facilitating operation when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator mechanism is positioned and configured in advance to enable smooth engagement and disengagement of the mandrel cup. The stationary actuator is pre-positioned relative to the rotating mandrel cup, allowing for controlled interaction at appropriate moments in the rotation cycle without requiring complex real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If the mandrel cup is engaged at all times, then the mandrel is stable during winding, but the chuck arm mechanism suffers from excessive vibration and wobble during loading and unloading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemandrel stability during windingVSAvoidvibration and wobble during loading/unloading
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The mandrel cup's engagement state is dynamically adjusted based on the operational phase. During winding, the cup is engaged to provide stability. During loading and unloading, the cup is disengaged to allow the mandrel to be freely manipulated, eliminating vibration and wobble issues. The actuator mechanism enables these dynamic transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the mandrel support function from continuous engagement and implements it through controlled engagement only when needed. By separating the support function from the loading/unloading operations, the system eliminates the harmful vibrations and wobbles that occur when the mandrel is constrained throughout the entire cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If a complex chuck arm mechanism is used to actuate the mandrel cup, then the mandrel can be supported reliably, but the number of moving parts increases and maintenance needs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemandrel support reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the actuation function from a complex multi-component chuck arm mechanism and implements it through a simple stationary actuator. This actuator uses basic mechanical elements (linkages, cams, or direct drives) that are easier to manufacture, operate, and maintain, while still providing reliable control of the mandrel cup engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator mechanism is designed to be self-contained and stationary, eliminating the need for complex moving parts that require maintenance. The simple mechanical design allows for easier repair and reduced maintenance needs compared to traditional multi-component chuck arm mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8783599B2Process for rewinding a web material
Publication Date: 2014.07.22 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • US8783599B2 patent drawing
  • US8783599B2 patent drawing
  • US8783599B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for winding a web substrate is disclosed. The process provides the steps of: (a) providing a turret assembly having a plurality of mandrels each having an unsupported end; (b) providing a mandrel cupping assembly for releasably engaging the unsupported ends of each mandrel; (c) driving the turret assembly about a closed mandrel path; (d) indexibly rotating a first mandrel to a first position; (e) disposing a core upon the mandrel; (f) connectively engaging a first cupping arm with the unsupported end of the mandrel with an actuator; (g) engaging a web substrate to the core; (h) disposing the web substrate about the core; (i) indexibly rotating the mandrel to a second position; (j) disengaging the cupping arm from the mandrel at the second position; and, (k) removing the core and the convolutely wound web material from the mandrel.