Segmented Mandrel With Diamond Blades for Soil Compaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current soil compaction methods, such as vibro-replacement and vibro-displacement, require expensive and heavy specialized equipment, leading to high costs and environmental concerns due to water usage, and there is a need for a simpler and more cost-effective mandrel for soil compaction.

Innovation Solution

A mandrel design featuring a base part, middle parts, diamond-shaped crushing blades, and a wedge-shaped bore head, which forms conical-shaped cavities in the soil for aggregate filling and compaction using dynamic loads, reducing friction and swelling, and allowing efficient penetration through hard rock surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If vibro-replacement or vibro-displacement methods are used for deep soil reinforcement, then load-bearing capability of the ground is improved, but construction cost and equipment complexity increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capabilityVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mandrel is divided into multiple segmented sections (first section, second section, third section) that can be connected together to achieve the required depth. This segmentation allows the equipment to be transported and assembled more easily while still achieving deep soil reinforcement, resolving the contradiction between penetration depth and equipment complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using complex vibratory probes that force their way through soil, the invention uses a simple mandrel that is dropped under its own weight and the weight of the aggregate fill to create impact compaction. This inverted approach - using gravitational impact rather than vibratory forcing - achieves deep reinforcement with much simpler equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Strength

If vibro-replacement method is used for soil compaction, then soil reinforcement is achieved, but environmental harm increases due to large quantities of water usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoil reinforcementVSAvoidenvironmental harm
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the water jetting component entirely from the soil reinforcement process. By using purely mechanical impact compaction through dropped mandrels, the method achieves effective soil reinforcement without any water usage, thereby removing the environmental harm associated with water disposal and pooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the previously harmful water usage into a beneficial water-free process. By replacing water jetting with gravitational impact compaction, the method not only eliminates environmental harm but also provides additional benefits such as reduced soil erosion and improved working conditions on construction sites.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If conventional mandrels are used for soil compaction, then compaction is achieved, but premature failure occurs due to high swelling pressure from surrounding soil

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemandrel durabilityVSAvoidswelling pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The mandrel features a tapered geometry where the cross-sectional area varies along its length - smaller at the tip and larger toward the top. This local variation in geometry allows the mandrel to better distribute and resist the swelling pressure from surrounding soil at different depths, preventing premature failure while maintaining compaction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If shallow foundations are used on inadequate near-surface soils, then construction cost is reduced, but foundation settlement increases beyond tolerable limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction costVSAvoidfoundation settlement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The mandrel method performs preliminary compaction of the near-surface soils before the foundation is constructed. By pre-densifying the soil in situ using the dropped mandrel technique, the ground achieves improved load-bearing capacity and reduced compressibility, allowing shallow foundations to be used without excessive settlement while maintaining cost effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mandrel design facilitates efficient soil compaction with reduced swelling and increased penetration efficiency, preventing premature failure and lowering construction costs by using dynamic loads and a simpler, less expensive structure.

Implementation Method 1

compaction using dynamic loads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDynamic load: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

reducing friction and swelling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction reduction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12018450B2Mandrel for soil compaction
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 NIROUMAND BAHMAN
  • US12018450B2 patent drawing
  • US12018450B2 patent drawing
  • US12018450B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mandrel for forming a cavity at a target location. The mandrel includes a base part positioned at a top end of the mandrel, a first middle part, a second middle part, a third middle part, a first plurality of diamond-shaped crushing blades, a second plurality of diamond-shaped crushing blades, and a bore head positioned at a bottom end of the mandrel. The first plurality of diamond-shaped crushing blades are attached around the first middle part and the second middle part. The second plurality of diamond-shaped crushing blades are attached around the third middle part and the bore head.