Gas Turbine Manifold Clevis Mounting for Cooling Uniformity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional manifold mounting arrangements in gas turbine engines result in uneven cooling due to large tolerances and weight, leading to inefficient engine operation, as they are complex, heavy, and obstruct impingement cooling areas.

Innovation Solution

A discrete manifold module with a clevis arrangement and locking bar system that securely attaches to the turbine casing with minimal clearances, ensuring consistent spacing and allowing for more accurate impingement cooling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a conventional W-shaped bracket mounting arrangement is used, then the manifold can be attached to the turbine casing, but the large clearances and tolerances result in uneven spacing between the manifold and casing, leading to non-uniform cooling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespacing uniformityVSAvoidmounting arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manifold is divided into multiple discrete modules, each with its own simplified mounting arrangement. This segmentation allows each module to be precisely positioned and spaced uniformly from the casing, eliminating the tolerance accumulation problems of conventional single-piece manifolds with complex W-shaped brackets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The complex W-shaped bracket intermediary is eliminated entirely. The mounting arrangement is reduced to essential components (clevis and pin) that directly attach the manifold module to the casing flange, removing the source of large clearances and tolerance buildup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If a conventional W-shaped bracket mounting arrangement is used, then the manifold can be secured to the casing, but the arrangement is heavy and has multiple failure modes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting reliabilityVSAvoidmounting arrangement weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The heavy W-shaped bracket is completely removed from the mounting arrangement. Only the essential clevis and pin components remain, dramatically reducing weight while eliminating multiple potential failure points associated with the complex bracket structure, anti-fret liners, and multiple fasteners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The simplified mounting arrangement with fewer parts reduces the number of potential failure modes. The design inherently provides sufficient support and positioning without requiring additional protective elements like anti-fret liners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Temperature

If a W-shaped bracket is used at the mounting position, then the manifold can be attached, but the bracket obstructs the impingement cooling of the casing at that position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasing cooling effectivenessVSAvoidmounting structure extent
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The extensive W-shaped bracket that blocked cooling airflow is removed. The replacement clevis-mounted manifold module positions the impingement holes closer to the casing and eliminates the bracket obstruction, allowing cooling air to directly impinge on the casing surface at the mounting position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting arrangement is designed to preserve pneumatic flow paths for cooling air. By eliminating the bulky W-shaped bracket, the design ensures unobstructed airflow to the casing for effective impingement cooling at all circumferential positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Temperature

If the manifold sits on mounting arrangements at the top and hangs from mounting arrangements at the bottom, then gravity is accommodated, but the distance to the casing becomes greater at the bottom, resulting in uneven cooling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling uniformityVSAvoidspacing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The complex sitting/hanging mounting mechanism is eliminated. The clevis and pin arrangement provides a simple, rigid connection that maintains consistent spacing between the manifold module and casing regardless of gravitational effects, ensuring uniform cooling across all positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting arrangement is designed to maintain consistent geometric relationships under various operational conditions including gravity and thermal expansion. The clevis-pin connection provides the necessary flexibility while preserving spacing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10208626B2Gas turbine manifold mounting arrangement including a clevis
Publication Date: 2019.02.19 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • US10208626B2 patent drawing
  • US10208626B2 patent drawing
  • US10208626B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A manifold mounting arrangement comprising: a discrete manifold module; a clevis arrangement having a clevis straddling a flange and pivotally secured to the flange by a clevis pin; and a locking bar configured to be coupled to the clevis and to constrain the manifold module relative to the clevis arrangement in the locality of the locking bar. The invention finds utility for mounting case cooling manifolds to turbine casing for a gas turbine engine.