Manipulator Force Reduction Input Means

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a lack of trust in manipulator systems, particularly in medical applications, where patients and doctors are hesitant to rely on them for critical procedures due to a lack of control over the force exerted by the manipulator, leading to discomfort and potential harm during treatments like ultrasound examinations.

Innovation Solution

A manipulator system with a control means and a force reduction input means that allows operators or patients to adjust the contact pressure exerted by the instrument in real-time, using sensors and user interfaces like buttons or controllers, enabling interactive control of the force applied during treatments without aborting the procedure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the manipulator applies sufficient contact force to perform effective treatment (e.g., ultrasound examination), then the treatment quality is improved, but the patient experiences discomfort or pain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment qualityVSAvoidpatient discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The manipulator system dynamically adjusts the contact force applied by the instrument based on real-time feedback from force sensors and patient input. The control device modifies the actuation signals to the drives, enabling the contact force to vary between a minimum effective level and a maximum comfortable level during the procedure, rather than maintaining a fixed force level

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates force sensors that continuously measure the contact force between the instrument and patient body. This measurement is fed back to the control device, which also receives input from the input device operated by the patient or operator. The control device uses this feedback to adjust the manipulator's actuation in real-time, creating a closed-loop control system that balances treatment effectiveness with patient comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the manipulator operates autonomously according to pre-defined paths, then productivity is improved, but the patient loses control and trust in the system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficiencyVSAvoidpatient control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The manipulator system is designed to operate in multiple modes: fully autonomous execution of pre-defined treatment paths for efficiency, and manual control modes where the patient or operator can directly control the manipulator movements. The system universally supports both automated and manual operation modes, allowing flexibility based on patient needs and treatment requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The input device serves as an intermediary between the patient and the manipulator system. When the patient activates the input device, it sends signals to the control device, which then adjusts the manipulator's behavior. This intermediary mechanism enables the patient to exert control over the autonomous system without directly manipulating the complex manipulator controls, maintaining both automation benefits and patient agency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If the manipulator follows a pre-defined trajectory, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the system cannot adapt to unexpected patient reactions or conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory accuracyVSAvoidreal-time adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

While maintaining the pre-defined trajectory as a guide, the system dynamically adjusts the actual path and contact force based on real-time feedback from force sensors and patient input through the input device. The control device modifies the trajectory execution in real-time, allowing the manipulator to deviate from the pre-planned path when necessary to accommodate patient reactions or unexpected conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The force sensors continuously monitor contact force during trajectory execution, and this feedback is combined with patient input from the input device. The control device uses this feedback to adaptively adjust the manipulator's movements and contact force, enabling real-time modification of the treatment path while maintaining overall trajectory accuracy and treatment effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3630422B1Manipulator system with input means for force reduction
Publication Date: 2023.09.06 KUKA DEUT GMBH
  • EP3630422B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3630422B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The present invention relates to a manipulator system comprising a manipulator (10) which is configured for guiding an instrument (11). The system furthermore comprises a control means which is configured to actuate the manipulator (10) such that the instrument (11) is pressed with a pressing force against a human body (20). Furthermore, a force reduction input means (30) is provided separately from the manipulator (10), which is operable by an operator (20) in order to reduce the pressing force.