Manual Cabin Pressure Control With Differential Pressure Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional all-electric cabin pressure control systems in aircraft face challenges during manual control mode after a fault in the automatic control channel, leading to significant operator workload and uncomfortable cabin altitude fluctuations due to the reliance on a single pneumatic pressure relief valve and lack of closed-loop control.

Innovation Solution

A cabin pressure control system that includes a manual motor controller (MMC) system with a microcontroller unit (MCU) using differential pressure sensors to regulate cabin pressure, enabling closed-loop control and independent monitoring of cabin altitude and differential pressure, thereby reducing reliance on a single pneumatic pressure relief valve and preventing erroneous depressurization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual control mode is used after automatic control channel fault, then the system can continue to operate, but operator workload increases significantly and cabin altitude fluctuates uncomfortably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecabin pressure control continuityVSAvoidoperator workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop control system in manual mode where the MMC continuously monitors cabin pressure via pressure sensors and automatically adjusts the outflow valve position to maintain target cabin altitude, eliminating the need for continuous manual intervention and reducing operator workload while maintaining control continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The manual motor controller system performs self-regulation by automatically adjusting cabin pressure based on sensor feedback without requiring constant operator input, allowing the system to service itself during manual operation mode

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If traditional manual control with single pressure sensor is used, then the system structure is simple, but the system cannot independently monitor differential pressure and relies on pneumatic relief valve which may have dormant failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor system structureVSAvoiddifferential pressure monitoring reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent separates the monitoring functions by implementing both a single pressure sensor for cabin altitude monitoring and a differential pressure sensor for differential pressure monitoring, allowing each sensor type to perform its specialized function independently and improving overall system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a differential pressure sensor as an intermediary device that directly measures differential pressure between cabin and ambient environments, providing independent monitoring capability without relying on the pneumatic relief valve for safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If adjustable hold type manual controller is used, then closed-loop control is achieved, but cabin rate fluctuations occur when operator opens and closes outflow valve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosed-loop control capabilityVSAvoidcabin pressure stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The MMC uses continuous feedback from pressure sensors to automatically adjust the outflow valve position, maintaining stable cabin pressure without requiring manual opening and closing operations that cause fluctuations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If pneumatic pressure relief valve is used to limit differential pressure, then the system can prevent over-pressurization, but the valve requires periodic testing and may have dormant failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifferential pressure limiting functionVSAvoidtesting and maintenance requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical pneumatic pressure relief valve with an electronically controlled differential pressure monitoring system using sensors and a microcontroller, eliminating the need for periodic manual testing while providing continuous differential pressure monitoring and control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4365082A1Cabin pressure control system
Publication Date: 2024.05.08 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP4365082A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4365082A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4365082A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A cabin pressure control system comprising an automatic motor controller (AMC); and a manual motor controller (MMC) that comprises a motor configured to regulate cabin pressure; a cabin pressure sensor configured to determine a first set of cabin pressure data; a differential pressure sensor comprising first and second ports, the first port configured to obtain a second set of cabin pressure data and the second port configured to obtain a first set of ambient pressure data; processing circuitry coupled to the cabin pressure sensor and to the differential pressure sensor, the processing circuitry configured to receive the first set of cabin pressure data; determine a first set of differential pressure data, the first set of differential pressure data relating the second set of cabin pressure data with the first set of ambient pressure data; disable the AMC; and control the motor to regulate the cabin pressure.