Manual Cutter Unit for Printer Tape Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cutter units for cutting tapes, labels, and tubes are heavy due to the inclusion of motors for driving movable blades, which increases the overall weight and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight cutter unit design incorporating a cutter holder, cradle, cutter lever, cradle lever, and transmitting portion, where the cutter lever and cradle lever are operated by the user to perform full-cutting and half-cutting operations without the need for a motor, allowing the cutter blade to move between full-cut and half-cut positions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a motor is provided to drive the movable blade for cutting operations, then the cutting function is reliable and automated, but the weight of the cutter unit increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting function reliabilityVSAvoidcutter unit weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the motor from the cutter unit, extracting the heavy automated driving mechanism while retaining the cutting function through manual operation. The cutter blade is now moved manually by the user along the guide rail, eliminating the need for motorized actuation and significantly reducing the overall weight of the device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The cutter unit is designed to be self-sufficient through manual operation. The user directly operates the cutter blade along the guide rail without requiring external motorized assistance. The transmitting portion mechanically links the cradle movement to the cutter blade movement, allowing the user's manual input to directly drive the cutting action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Extent of automation

If a motor is provided to drive the movable blade, then automated cutting operation is achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting operation automationVSAvoidcutter unit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motorized automation system is extracted and removed from the device. Instead of automated motor-driven operation, the patent implements manual operation where the user directly controls the cutter blade movement, significantly simplifying the device structure while maintaining cutting functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a motor to drive the cutter blade directly, the patent inverts the approach by having the cradle movement (driven manually) transmit motion to the cutter blade through a mechanical transmitting portion. This reversal of the driving sequence simplifies the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Manufacturing precision

If the cradle is positioned for full-cutting, then complete cutting is achieved, but the gap dimension is larger; if positioned for half-cutting, then partial cutting is achieved, but the gap dimension is smaller

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting precisionVSAvoidgap dimension
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cradle is designed to be dynamically positionable between two distinct positions: full-cut position and half-cut position. The transmitting portion mechanically links the cradle position to the cutter blade position, allowing dynamic adjustment of the cutting depth. This dynamic positioning capability enables the system to adapt between complete and partial cutting operations based on user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the positional parameter of the cradle to control the cutting operation. By moving the cradle between full-cut and half-cut positions, the system varies the engagement depth of the cutter blade with the material, thereby changing the cutting parameter from complete to partial cutting. This parameter change is transmitted through the mechanical linkage to the cutter blade.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11007799B2Cutter unit selectively performing one of full-cutting and half-cutting, and printer including the same
Publication Date: 2021.05.18 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • US11007799B2 patent drawing
  • US11007799B2 patent drawing
  • US11007799B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cutter unit includes a cutter holder, a cradle, a cutter lever, a cradle lever, and a transmitting portion. The cradle faces the cutter holder and movable between a full-cut position and a half-cut position. The cutter lever is configured to be contactable with the cutter holder. The cradle lever is configured to be contactable with the cradle. The transmitting portion is configured to move the cutter lever and the cradle lever in interlocking relation therebetween. The transmitting portion is configured to shut off transmission of movement of the cutter lever to the cradle lever in accordance with only operation to the cutter lever out of the cutter lever and the cradle lever while the transmitting portion is configured to transmit movement of the cradle lever to the cutter lever in accordance with only operation to the cradle lever out of the cutter lever and the cradle lever.