Manual Dispensing Mechanism for Stackable Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devices for dispensing stackable or rollable materials, such as cards and projectiles, lack control over speed and frequency, often jam when used in quick succession, and rely on environmentally unfriendly electronics and batteries, increasing costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A manually cranked toy device with a gear-driven mechanism that allows for controlled dispensing of materials by building up speed in the drive wheel, featuring a separate release mechanism that can be actuated to dispense materials at variable speeds and frequencies, eliminating the need for batteries and electronics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If electronically powered devices with motors are used to dispense materials, then the dispensing mechanism is automated and can operate continuously, but the device complexity increases due to batteries, PCBs, and motors, and environmental friendliness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated dispensingVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes electronic components (batteries, PCBs, motors) from the dispensing mechanism, extracting only the essential mechanical elements needed for operation. This simplifies the device while maintaining automated dispensing capability through manual cranking that builds rotational speed in the drive wheel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The manually cranked drive mechanism allows the user to directly control and build up rotational speed in the drive wheel, eliminating the need for external power sources and control electronics. The system serves itself through direct mechanical energy input from the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Extent of automation

If electronically powered devices with motors are used to dispense materials, then automated dispensing is achieved, but manufacturing cost increases due to electronic components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated dispensingVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates expensive electronic components (PCBs, motors, batteries) from the design, retaining only simple mechanical elements that are cheaper to manufacture and assemble. This dramatically reduces manufacturing costs while preserving the core dispensing function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism uses simple, inexpensive mechanical components that can be easily manufactured and replaced if needed, rather than expensive electronic assemblies. The manual cranking mechanism and basic release trigger create a low-cost device suitable for various applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If high-speed projectile firing mechanisms are used, then projectiles can be dispensed rapidly, but control over speed and frequency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispensing rateVSAvoidcontrol over speed and frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The user performs preliminary action by manually cranking the drive mechanism to build up rotational speed in the drive wheel before actual dispensing occurs. This pre-acceleration allows for rapid dispensing when the release mechanism is activated, while the user maintains control over the speed buildup process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static, electronically controlled speed regime to a dynamic, manually controlled one. The user can vary the cranking speed to control the rotational speed of the drive wheel, and the release mechanism allows flexible timing of dispensing events, providing dynamic control over both speed and frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If multiple projectiles are released into the firing cavity in quick succession, then rapid dispensing is achieved, but jamming increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverapid dispensingVSAvoidjamming
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The dispensing mechanism operates through periodic action where the user cranks the drive mechanism to build speed, then activates the release mechanism for a controlled dispensing event. This rhythmic pattern of acceleration and release prevents material buildup and jamming that would occur with continuous, uncontrolled firing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The manual cranking maintains continuous rotational motion in the drive wheel, ensuring materials are consistently fed through the system without interruption. The continuous rotation prevents material from stacking up in the firing cavity, eliminating the jamming condition that occurs when dispensing is intermittent or uncontrolled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides direct, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective control over the dispensing of materials, allowing for rapid or controlled release without jamming, and is suitable for a variety of thin, chartaceous materials.

Implementation Method 1

A manually cranked toy device with a gear-driven mechanism that allows for controlled dispensing of materials by building up speed in the drive wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 2

A manually cranked toy device with a gear-driven mechanism that allows for controlled dispensing of materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear mechanism: Gear

Implementation Method 3

The drive wheel preferably relies on frictional contact with the material and may have a special high friction periphery so as to work with a wide variety of materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3668619B1Toy device for dispensing stackable or rollable materials and related methods
Publication Date: 2021.07.14 GW DEV UK LTD
  • EP3668619B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3668619B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3668619B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A toy device for dispensing stackable or rollable materials and related methods are described. The device has a housing (12) arranged to contain a stack or roll of material and having a dispensing aperture (30). A manually actuated drive mechanism (80) is provided by which a user can rotate a drive wheel (84) of the drive mechanism. The drive wheel (84) contacts and when rotated engages a portion of the material and to drive it through the dispensing aperture (30). A release mechanism (60) is provided that can be moved to allow the material to be driven through the aperture (30). The drive mechanism can be actuated independently from the release mechanism.