Manual Shaker Transducer Test System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for testing accelerometers and velocity transducers are cumbersome and expensive, making field testing impractical due to the need for bulky and costly electromechanical shakers and spectrum analyzers.

Innovation Solution

A compact transducer test system comprising a manual shaker and signal conditioner unit that allows technicians to manually shake reference and test accelerometers, comparing their output signals to determine pass or fail conditions using LEDs and adjustable thresholds, eliminating the need for expensive equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional electromechanical shaker and spectrum analyzer are used for testing, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccelerometer output measurementVSAvoidtesting equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a reference accelerometer with known good performance to create a baseline for comparison. Instead of using complex spectrum analyzers, the system copies the testing function through direct comparison between the reference transducer and the transducer under test, using simple electronic components to achieve the measurement objective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the complex electromechanical shaker system with a manual shaker that can be operated by hand. This substitution maintains the essential vibration function needed for testing while dramatically reducing device complexity, cost, and portability requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If traditional electromechanical shaker system is used, then testing accuracy is improved, but portability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransducer performance characterizationVSAvoidtesting equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the heavy electromechanical shaker with a manual shaker that can be operated by hand. This substitution maintains the essential vibration function needed for testing while dramatically reducing weight and improving portability for field testing applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a reference transducer to copy the testing function, eliminating the need for heavy laboratory equipment. The comparison method allows accurate testing to be performed with minimal equipment weight by using the reference transducer as the measurement standard.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If traditional spectrum analyzer is used, then measurement precision is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccelerometer output analysisVSAvoidcost-effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a reference accelerometer with known good performance to create a baseline for comparison. This copying approach eliminates the need for expensive spectrum analyzers while maintaining measurement precision through direct comparison between the reference and test transducers using simple electronic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive spectrum analyzers with inexpensive electronic components including operational amplifiers, filters, and voltmeters. These cheaper components perform the necessary signal conditioning and comparison functions without requiring costly laboratory equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Device complexity

If manual shaker and signal conditioner are used, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting equipmentVSAvoidfield testing procedure
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a reference transducer that serves itself as the measurement standard, eliminating the need for complex automated control systems. The manual shaker allows the technician to directly control the vibration, and the signal conditioner automatically performs the comparison and displays pass/fail results, making the system self-sufficient and easy to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses visual indicators such as LED lights or color-coded displays to show pass/fail results. This provides immediate, intuitive feedback to the technician without requiring interpretation of complex waveforms or data, significantly improving ease of operation in field conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Data Source

PatentEP2240753B1System and method for testing of transducers
Publication Date: 2014.12.31 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC
  • EP2240753B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2240753B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2240753B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A transducer test system for testing accelerometers or velocity transducers includes a signal conditioner and a shaker that can be used in a field environment, for example by an avionics technician at an aircraft. A test transducer and a reference transducer, which is a known-good version of the test transducer, are mounted onto the shaker and electrically connected to the signal conditioner. The technician shakes the two transducers simultaneously by manually shaking the shaker. The signal conditioner receives and compares the signals output from the test and reference transducer in order to determine the operating condition of the test transducer.