Manual Valve Lever Drive for Precise Sealing and Force Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing manually operated valves lack a design that provides a pleasant and reliable manual actuation experience, with issues in force transmission, precision, and ease of operation.

Innovation Solution

A valve drive mechanism featuring lever pairs with rotatable joints and a manually actuatable handle, allowing for a slider-crank mechanism that ensures smooth, precise, and reliable operation with high force transmission, even under high lateral forces, and includes features like elastic elements and latching devices for enhanced safety and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple manual actuation mechanism is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ease of operation and reliability deteriorate due to insufficient force transmission and imprecise control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual actuation experienceVSAvoidvalve drive mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve drive mechanism is segmented into multiple lever pairs (first lever pair and second lever pair), each with specific rotational joints (first, second, and third rotational joints). This segmentation allows independent optimization of each lever's function, improving ease of operation while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism employs dynamic lever arms that rotate about fixed axes, transforming manual rotational input into controlled linear motion of the closure element. The dynamic configuration allows variable mechanical advantage throughout the stroke, enhancing operability without requiring excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Force

If a lever pair mechanism is introduced to improve force transmission, then the ease of operation improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce transmissionVSAvoidvalve drive mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Two lever pairs are merged into a single integrated valve drive mechanism, where the first and second levers of each pair work together with shared rotational joints. This merging consolidates force transmission functions, achieving high force multiplication while avoiding the complexity of separate mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotational joints serve as intermediaries that couple the lever pairs to each other and to the valve rod. These intermediary elements facilitate smooth force transmission between components, reducing the complexity of direct connections while maintaining effective force transfer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the closure element moves quickly to bridge the middle actuation path, then the productivity increases, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to reduced control over closing position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveopening and closing speedVSAvoidsealing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The lever mechanism provides dynamic control where the mechanical advantage varies continuously during the actuation cycle. In the middle range, the geometry allows rapid motion, while near the closed position, the lever angles naturally reduce speed, enabling quick operation without sacrificing sealing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism exploits changes in geometric parameters (lever angles, joint positions) throughout the actuation cycle. As the closure element approaches the closed position, the lever configuration naturally reduces velocity and increases force, achieving both high productivity and precise sealing through parameter variation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables valves with improved kinematics for gentle sealing and rapid opening/closing, ensuring reliable actuation, precise repeat accuracy, and reduced risk of accidental operation, while maintaining a compact design.

Implementation Method 1

They enable an optimum transmission ratio and a pleasant feel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 2

the valve drive has a valve drive housing and at least one lever pair, preferably two lever pairs, wherein each lever pair has a first lever and a second lever

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLever: Lever

Implementation Method 3

Both the first lever and the second lever can be straight, but also curved or angled, e.g., C-shaped or V-shaped

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20260043493A1valve
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 VAT HOLDING AG
  • US20260043493A1 patent drawing
  • US20260043493A1 patent drawing
  • US20260043493A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A valve (1) having a valve rod (2) and a closure element (3), which is arranged on the valve rod (2), for closing a valve opening (4). The closure element (3) can be moved between a closing position and a maximum open position by the valve rod (2) solely in a linear manner in directions (5) that are parallel to the longitudinal extension (6) of the valve rod (2), and the valve (1) has a valve drive (7) with a handle (8) which can be actuated manually. The valve drive (7) has a valve drive housing (9) and at least one lever pair (10), and each lever pair (10) has a first lever (11) and a second lever (12).