Manufacturer Matching Interface for Custom Item Creation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for creating physical products lack an efficient mechanism for matching user inputs with suitable manufacturers, leading to suboptimal production processes and resource inefficiencies, as they do not effectively utilize machine learning to personalize product attributes and manufacturing parameters based on user feedback and historical data.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses machine learning models to dynamically alter user interfaces, generate manufacturing parameters, and match users with qualified manufacturers by analyzing uniqueness, attribute matching, and user preferences, allowing for real-time adjustments through augmented reality interfaces and feedback loops.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If machine learning models are used to generate manufacturing parameters and match users with manufacturers, then productivity and manufacturing precision are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction process efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces machine learning models as intermediary components that mediate between user inputs and manufacturing processes. These models process user feedback and historical data to generate optimized manufacturing parameters, acting as a bridge that translates complex requirements into actionable production instructions without requiring direct complex interactions between users and manufacturing systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where user interactions with product attributes are continuously collected and fed back into the machine learning models. This feedback mechanism allows the models to learn from historical data and refine manufacturing parameter generation, improving productivity while managing system complexity through iterative optimization rather than requiring complete system redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the user interface is dynamically altered to include subset of attributes based on manufacturing parameters, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interface usabilityVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface is designed to be dynamic rather than static, automatically adjusting the displayed attributes based on the current manufacturing parameters. This allows the interface to adapt its complexity to the specific context, showing only relevant attributes to users while maintaining ease of operation without requiring users to navigate through all possible attributes in every scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the user interface are tailored to specific manufacturing contexts, with each section displaying only the attributes relevant to that particular parameter set. This local customization of interface quality ensures users encounter only necessary information in each context, improving usability while distributing complexity across different interface regions rather than concentrating it all at once

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If machine learning models analyze uniqueness and characteristics to match manufacturers, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturer matching accuracyVSAvoidmodel generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning models are pre-trained on historical manufacturing data and manufacturer characteristics before actual use. This preliminary training phase allows the models to develop sophisticated matching capabilities in advance, so that during actual manufacturer selection, the analysis can be performed quickly without requiring extensive real-time computation, thus reducing time loss while maintaining high matching precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11874645B2Multi-source item creation system
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 ETSY INC
  • US11874645B2 patent drawing
  • US11874645B2 patent drawing
  • US11874645B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer readable medium for a multi-source item creation system. The method includes receiving, through a user interface and from a requesting member of a digital platform, manufacturing parameters for an item to be manufactured, dynamically altering the user interface based on the manufacturing parameters to include different user interface elements that correspond to a subset of attributes, determining, based on interaction with the different user interface elements, additional manufacturing parameters, generating, using one or more machine learning models, a set of manufacturers based on the manufacturing parameters and the additional manufacturing parameters, wherein the one or more machine learning models have been trained to generate the set of manufacturers based on a level of uniqueness of the item to be manufactured and characteristics of the manufacturers, and returning, to the requesting member, a subset of the set of manufacturers.