Programmable Manufacturing Advisor for Real-Time Bottleneck Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturing processes often face challenges in achieving desired productivity improvements due to complexity and the time required to determine optimal actions, leading to missed schedules, economic losses, and material/energy waste from machine breakdowns and quality issues.

Innovation Solution

A programmable manufacturing advisor (PMA) that automatically receives measurements, determines baseline and predicted performance metrics, and recommends improvement actions by using an information unit to generate mathematical models and an optimization unit to compare these metrics, providing continuous and real-time recommendations to operations managers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual analysis and decision-making processes are used to determine productivity improvement actions, then manufacturing process complexity can be managed, but the time required to determine optimal actions increases, leading to missed schedules and economic losses

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidtime to determine optimal actions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis processes with an automated computer-based system that collects data from sensors, processes measurements, and generates improvement recommendations automatically. The system substitutes human operators' manual decision-making with automated algorithms that analyze process parameters and identify optimal actions in real-time, dramatically reducing the time required to determine productivity improvement actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing system performs self-diagnosis and self-optimization by automatically monitoring its own parameters, analyzing performance data, and generating improvement recommendations without external intervention. The system serves itself by identifying bottlenecks, predicting failures, and suggesting corrective actions, enabling continuous self-improvement and reducing dependency on manual analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If productivity improvement actions are delayed due to complex analysis requirements, then analysis accuracy can be maintained, but machine breakdowns and quality issues occur, causing economic losses and material/energy waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors manufacturing process parameters through sensors and feeds this data back to the analysis engine in real-time. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to detect deviations from optimal performance, predict potential failures before they occur, and immediately generate corrective recommendations, thereby maintaining high reliability while preventing productivity losses from breakdowns and quality issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis and prediction of potential problems before they manifest as actual machine breakdowns or quality defects. By continuously analyzing process parameters and predicting future states, the system enables preventive maintenance and process adjustments before failures occur, maintaining reliability while avoiding productivity interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If real-time automated recommendations are implemented, then productivity improvement time is reduced and throughput increases, but system complexity and measurement requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal measurement and analysis system that can handle multiple different manufacturing processes and parameters through a single integrated platform. The system uses standardized sensors and data collection mechanisms that can measure various process parameters (temperature, pressure, flow rates, etc.) across different operations, reducing the need for process-specific complex measurement systems while enabling real-time automated recommendations across the entire manufacturing facility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11861739B2Programmable manufacturing advisor for smart production systems
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 THE RGT UNIV OF MICHIGAN
  • US11861739B2 patent drawing
  • US11861739B2 patent drawing
  • US11861739B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A programmable manufacturing advisor includes an information unit that receives measurements for at least one parameter of each operation of a plurality of operations in the manufacturing process, and an analytics unit that determines a baseline performance metric for the manufacturing process based on the measurements of the at least one parameter. The programmable manufacturing advisor also includes an optimization unit that determines a recommended improvement action by determining a predicted performance metric for the manufacturing process based on an adjusted value of the at least one parameter and comparing the predicted performance metric to the baseline performance metric. The optimization unit also automatically presents the recommended improvement action to the operations manager.