Automated Manufacturing Cells for Just-in-Sequence Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manufacturing facilities face inefficiencies due to manual tracking and reconciliation processes, leading to errors and delays in inventory management, particularly in situations where components are out of stock, disrupting the just-in-sequence production flow.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an automated manufacturing system with programmable logic controllers (PLCs), servers, and devices like fork trucks equipped with tablets and barcode scanners, which communicate with a central server to automate inventory tracking, real-time verification, and maintenance scheduling, enabling just-in-sequence assembly recovery and optimizing production workflows.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual tracking and reconciliation processes are used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision and reliability deteriorate due to errors in inventory management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory management accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical tracking processes with an automated digital system. Barcode scanners, RFID tags, and software platforms automatically track inventory movements, replacing manual data entry and paper-based reconciliation processes. This substitution eliminates human error in tracking while maintaining operational simplicity through user-friendly interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service inventory management through automated verification processes. When components are scanned during assembly, the system automatically verifies availability, updates inventory records, and triggers replenishment orders without requiring manual intervention. This self-service capability improves accuracy while reducing the complexity of manual oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated tracking systems are implemented, then productivity is improved through real-time verification, but device complexity increases due to additional hardware and software requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system is designed with multi-functionality to justify the added complexity. The same barcode scanners and software platform used for inventory tracking also serve as verification tools during assembly, trigger replenishment orders, provide analytics, and integrate with existing ERP systems. This universal application maximizes productivity gains across multiple operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where inventory data is automatically captured, analyzed, and used to trigger immediate actions. When component levels drop below thresholds, the system automatically generates replenishment orders. This real-time feedback mechanism significantly improves productivity by preventing production stoppages while managing complexity through algorithmic decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If manual inventory reconciliation is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but loss of time occurs due to delays in detecting component shortages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection time for component shortagesVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring inventory levels and predicting future shortages before they occur. The software analyzes usage patterns, lead times, and current stock levels to proactively identify potential component shortages. This allows the system to trigger replenishment orders in advance, eliminating detection delays while maintaining ease of operation through automated monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Manual inventory checking and reconciliation processes are replaced with automated scanning and digital tracking systems. Barcode scanners and RFID readers automatically detect component movements and update inventory records in real-time, replacing manual counting and paper-based tracking. This substitution eliminates detection delays while the user-friendly interface maintains operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If automated manufacturing systems are implemented, then reliability is improved through real-time tracking, but device complexity increases due to integration of multiple systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction continuityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functions into an integrated platform. Inventory tracking, assembly verification, replenishment ordering, and analytics are combined into a single software system that communicates with existing ERP and manufacturing execution systems. This consolidation improves reliability by ensuring data consistency across all functions while managing integration complexity through standardized APIs and protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses intermediary components to bridge different systems. Barcode scanners and RFID readers serve as intermediaries between physical inventory and the digital tracking system. The software platform acts as an intermediary between inventory management and replenishment ordering processes. These intermediaries improve reliability by ensuring accurate data transfer while simplifying integration complexity through standardized communication protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11740615B2Automated manufacturing facility and methods
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 SWISSLOG LOGISTICS INC
  • US11740615B2 patent drawing
  • US11740615B2 patent drawing
  • US11740615B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A manufacturing system (20) comprises: one or more stores (84; 80A-80C; 92) for raw materials, work-in-progress (WIP), and finished goods; a plurality of manufacturing cells (40A 40F), each cell includes: one or more machines (42A-42C) for manufacturing an assembly; and a programmable logic controller (PLC) (44) for controlling the machines; one or more devices (60, 70) for moving raw material, WIP, and finished goods; and one or more servers (32) for communicating with the PLCs and the devices. The one or more servers further have programming for: instructing (642) the plurality of manufacturing cells to assemble finished goods from the raw materials; instructing (628, 632) the one or more devices to move said raw materials and finished goods; and just in sequence (JIS) skipped assembly recovery steps (730) for the manufacturing cells and devices.