Manufacturing Data Packets for Real-Time Fault Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional manufacturing data collection and analysis methods are cumbersome and reactive, leading to significant lag times in identifying and addressing problems, which can result in costly corrective measures and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for monitoring manufacturing that includes sensors and a controller to collect, process, and analyze data in real-time, using data models and algorithms to generate actionable insights and predict potential issues before they occur.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional reactive data collection methods are used, then data can be collected after problems are identified, but significant lag times occur between problem identification and solution implementation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelag time between problem identification and solution implementationVSAvoidcumbersome and reactive data collection process
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously collecting and processing manufacturing data in real-time before problems occur. Sensors monitor parameters such as temperature, pressure, and vibration continuously, and the system processes this data through data models to predict potential issues before they manifest as actual problems, enabling proactive rather than reactive responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring manufacturing data, comparing it against predefined data models and thresholds, and providing real-time alerts when anomalies are detected. This closed-loop feedback system enables immediate response to deviations from normal operation, reducing the time between problem emergence and corrective action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If traditional data analysis methods are used, then problems can be investigated after occurrence, but costly corrective measures such as recalls and reworking are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct quality and operational efficiencyVSAvoidcostly corrective measures including recalls and reworking
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary action by using predictive analytics to identify potential quality issues before they occur. Data models analyze manufacturing parameters in real-time to predict defects, allowing corrective actions to be taken during production rather than after product completion, thereby preventing recalls and rework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system skips the traditional sequential process of production-then-inspection-by-rushing through continuous real-time monitoring and predictive analysis during the manufacturing process itself. This enables immediate detection and correction of potential quality issues without waiting for final product inspection, eliminating the need for costly post-production corrective measures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Loss of information

If heterogeneous factory data from various sensors is collected, then comprehensive manufacturing information is available, but difficulties arise in tracing problems to specific root causes among many machines and processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive manufacturing information from multiple sourcesVSAvoiddifficulty in tracing problems to specific root causes
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments heterogeneous manufacturing data into distinct categories and sources, organizing data from different sensors, machines, and processes into structured data models. Each data source is tagged with metadata identifying its origin, enabling systematic analysis and easy tracing of problems to specific root causes while maintaining comprehensive information from all sources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces data models as intermediaries between raw heterogeneous sensor data and analysis processes. These data models serve as standardized interfaces that organize and contextualize data from multiple sources, making it easier to trace problems through the manufacturing process by providing a structured framework for data relationships and dependencies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If real-time data processing is implemented, then proactive problem identification is enabled, but complex data models and algorithms are required to process heterogeneous data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time manufacturing monitoring and predictive capabilityVSAvoidcomplex data models and processing algorithms
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs universal data models that can handle multiple types of heterogeneous manufacturing data through a single standardized framework. These multi-functional data models accommodate various sensor inputs, machine data, and process information using consistent structures and algorithms, enabling real-time processing without requiring separate complex systems for each data type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11921014B2System and method for monitoring manufacturing
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 SIGHT MACHINE INC
  • US11921014B2 patent drawing
  • US11921014B2 patent drawing
  • US11921014B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving raw data and generating a manufacturing data packet (MDP) that includes at least a portion of the raw data. Generating the MDP includes associating metadata with the raw data and associating a timestamp with the raw data. The timestamp is synchronized to a common reference time. A data model associated with the MDP is obtained. The data model includes one or more predefined data types and one or more predefined data fields. A first data type from the one or more predefined data types is determined based at least in part on characteristics of the raw data. An algorithm is determined based at least in part on the first data type. The MDP is processed according to the algorithm to produce an output. The first data type is associated with the raw data. The output is associated with a data field of the first data type.