Manufacturing Design Modification System for Geometric Feature Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Designers often overlook manufacturing complexity during the design stage, leading to delays and increased costs due to unawareness of factors like specialized tools and processes required for geometric features, which are not easily visualized or comprehended from traditional CAD drawings.

Innovation Solution

A system that receives a CAD model, identifies geometric features, and suggests modifications to size, shape, and location to reduce manufacturing complexity by analyzing manufacturing processes, providing feedback through a user interface to guide designers towards more efficient and cost-effective designs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If designers focus on component performance factors (size, shape, material), then design quality improves, but manufacturing complexity increases due to lack of awareness about manufacturing constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of manufacturing complexity during the design stage by automatically detecting geometric features and evaluating them against manufacturing constraints. This allows designers to identify and resolve potential manufacturing issues before production begins, preventing delays and cost increases while maintaining design quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides automated feedback to designers about manufacturing complexity by analyzing geometric features and generating recommendations for modification. This feedback loop enables designers to adjust their designs to reduce manufacturing complexity while preserving performance requirements, resolving the contradiction between design quality and manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If designers create detailed geometric designs, then design performance improves, but manufacturing time increases due to specialized processes and tools required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system conducts preliminary evaluation of geometric features against manufacturing constraints before production. By identifying features that require specialized processes early in the design stage, the system allows for timely modifications to simplify manufacturing, thereby reducing manufacturing time while preserving design performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system analyzes geometric feature parameters (such as hole size, cut shape, feature location) and suggests modifications to these parameters that would enable standard manufacturing processes instead of specialized ones. This reduces manufacturing time while maintaining the functional performance of the component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If complex geometric features are used to achieve design goals, then design functionality improves, but manufacturing cost increases due to specialized tools and processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign functionalityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates geometric feature parameters and suggests alternative parameter values that would achieve the same design functionality using standard manufacturing processes. For example, it may suggest adjusting hole diameter, cut geometry, or feature placement to enable production with common tools rather than specialized equipment, thereby reducing manufacturing cost while preserving functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system identifies geometric features that can be manufactured using standard processes by analyzing whether alternative approaches exist. It suggests modifications that replicate the functional outcome of complex features using simpler, more cost-effective manufacturing methods, reducing costs while maintaining design versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Productivity

If designers submit designs without manufacturing review, then design development speed improves, but production delays occur due to undetected manufacturing issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign development speedVSAvoidproduction delays
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated manufacturing constraint analysis during the design development phase, identifying potential manufacturing issues before design submission. This preliminary review prevents production delays by catching problems early when they can be easily corrected, maintaining fast design development speed while avoiding later delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides immediate feedback to designers about manufacturing issues detected during analysis. This real-time feedback allows designers to correct problems during the design development phase rather than after submission, maintaining rapid design iteration while preventing production delays caused by undetected manufacturing constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11132473B2Manufacturing design modification system
Publication Date: 2021.09.28 APRIORI TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11132473B2 patent drawing
  • US11132473B2 patent drawing
  • US11132473B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are systems and methods for identifying manufacturability improvements to a component prior to the design being provided to a manufacturer. In one example, the method may include receiving an image including a geometric design of a component, receiving an identification of a type of manufacturing process for the component from among a plurality of types of manufacturing processes, recognizing a geometric feature of the component from the image based on the type of manufacturing process, determining a modification to one or more of a size, a shape, and a location of the recognized geometric feature for reducing manufacturing complexity, and displaying, via a user interface, a suggestion for modifying the geometric design of the component based on the determined modification of the recognized geometric feature.