Manufacturing Job Scheduling With ML Forecasts for Dynamic Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional job scheduling systems in manufacturing environments face challenges such as suboptimal resource utilization, lack of adaptability to changing production conditions, and difficulty in handling complex processes, leading to inefficiencies and increased operational costs.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes machine learning techniques to process real-time operational parameters from sensors, forecast future operating conditions, and dynamically adjust scheduling algorithms to optimize resource allocation and task sequencing across short-term and long-term intervals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional manual or semi-automated scheduling processes are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidscheduling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual scheduling mechanisms with an automated scheduling system that utilizes machine learning models and algorithms. The system automatically processes operational parameters, predicts future conditions, and generates optimized schedules without human intervention, thereby improving resource utilization while managing complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling system performs self-optimization by continuously learning from operational data and automatically adjusting schedules based on predicted future conditions. The system serves itself by autonomously making scheduling decisions without requiring external manual input, improving efficiency while the automated nature manages the complexity burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If static scheduling models are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to changing production conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing production conditionsVSAvoidscheduling model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic scheduling by using machine learning models that continuously learn from operational parameters and adapt to changing production conditions. The system transitions from static predefined rules to dynamic predictive modeling, allowing schedules to automatically adjust based on real-time and forecasted conditions, thereby improving adaptability while the automated learning manages model complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where operational parameters are continuously monitored, analyzed by machine learning models, and used to refine future scheduling decisions. This feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from past performance and adapt to changing conditions, improving versatility while the automated feedback processing manages the complexity of continuous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If advanced machine learning techniques are implemented, then scheduling accuracy and adaptability are improved, but data integration challenges and model complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity and data integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the scheduling system into distinct functional modules: data collection from operational parameters, machine learning model training, prediction generation, and schedule optimization. This modular architecture manages complexity by dividing the sophisticated machine learning implementation into manageable components while maintaining high scheduling accuracy through specialized processing in each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary layers between raw operational data and scheduling decisions, including data preprocessing modules and feature extraction components. These intermediaries simplify the integration of diverse data sources by standardizing inputs to the machine learning models, thereby improving scheduling accuracy while managing the complexity of data integration through structured intermediate processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240319718A1System and method for intelligent scheduling of manufacturing jobs
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 QUANTIPHI INC
  • US20240319718A1 patent drawing
  • US20240319718A1 patent drawing
  • US20240319718A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses a system for scheduling jobs within a manufacturing environment, integrating a plurality of sensors to capture operational parameters. A processing unit, linked to the plurality of sensors, analyzes datasets to determine the operational parameters. A machine learning module coupled to the processing unit, enhances a scheduling algorithm using the operational parameters. This machine learning module includes a first predictor for estimating job processing times and forecasting operating conditions based on these parameters. A formulator adjusts the scheduling algorithm using the forecasted operating conditions for distinct time intervals. Additionally, a second predictor forecasts subsequent operating conditions based on the modified scheduling algorithm and initial forecasts. The system optimizes job scheduling, enhancing efficiency and productivity within the manufacturing environment.