Manufacturing Operation Model for Key Performance Indicator Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex manufacturing systems face challenges in efficiently estimating key performance indicators for different product variants due to their adaptable and flexible nature, which traditional production efficiency models cannot effectively handle, especially in producing small lots of diverse product variants within a product family.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that provides predictions of key performance indicators by creating a manufacturing operation model for each product variant, learning model parameters from collected data, and updating production efficiency models to calculate predictions based on process context and execution data, allowing for efficient evaluation of production viability and optimal variant selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional production efficiency models are used for rigid production execution flows and predefined work schedules, then manufacturing precision and stability are maintained, but adaptability and versatility deteriorate when producing small lots of different product variants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different product variantsVSAvoidcomplexity of efficiency assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex manufacturing system into multiple manufacturing operation models, each representing a specific operation type. This segmentation allows the system to handle different product variants by combining appropriate operation models, thereby improving adaptability without overwhelming complexity in the overall efficiency assessment framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal production efficiency model that can assess efficiency across multiple product variants and operation types. By designing the model to be variant-agnostic and focusing on operation-level characteristics, it achieves multi-functionality that improves adaptability while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized assessment criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If manufacturing operation models are created for each operation type and updated through automated learning, then measurement precision of key performance indicators improves, but device complexity increases due to data collection and model updating mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of key performance indicator measurementsVSAvoidcomplexity of data collection and model updating system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing operation models automatically update themselves through automated learning from collected process data. This self-service mechanism improves measurement precision over time without requiring manual intervention, while the system complexity is managed by automating rather than manually orchestrating the data collection and model updating processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where collected process context data and execution data are used to automatically learn and update model parameters. This feedback mechanism continuously improves measurement precision of key performance indicators, while the automated nature of the feedback process manages complexity by eliminating manual model updating steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated learning is used to update model parameters based on collected process data, then productivity improves through faster efficiency assessment, but loss of information increases due to reliance on automated data processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of efficiency assessmentVSAvoidinformation accuracy in automated learning
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by collecting and storing process context data and execution data before the actual efficiency assessment is needed. This preparatory data collection enables fast automated learning and model updating when assessments are required, improving productivity while minimizing information loss by having data readily available in organized formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts model parameters based on collected data while maintaining the ability to preserve and reference original process data. This dynamic updating improves productivity by using current information for assessments, while the system manages information retention by maintaining historical data and allowing verification of automated learning results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11775911B2Method and apparatus for providing predictions of key performance indicators of a complex manufacturing system
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 SIEMENS AG
  • US11775911B2 patent drawing
  • US11775911B2 patent drawing
  • US11775911B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method provides predictions of key performance indicators of a product variant of a product family manufactured by a complex manufacturing system in a manufacturing process. The method provides a manufacturing operation model for each manufacturing operation type used to manufacture a product variant of the product family. Via the complex manufacturing system measured contributions to key performance indicators, process context data and process execution data of manufacturing operations, are provided. The model parameters of the provided manufacturing operation models are learned automatically based on collected process context data, collected process execution data, and measured contributions to key performance indicators, to update the manufacturing operation models. An updated production efficiency model combining updated manufacturing models including the updated manufacturing operation models, to calculate the predictions of the key performance indicators, of the product variant, to be manufactured, depending on a product configuration of the respective product variant, is evaluated.