Manufacturing Prediction Models for Cost and Lead-Time Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturing processes lack reliable and accurate predictive tools for product appraisals and production planning, relying heavily on human experience, which leads to inconsistencies and suboptimal optimization due to the absence of standardized methodologies.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing regression machine learning models and multi-objective optimization to generate predictive values for manufacturing processes based on digital models, providing near real-time, objective, and consistent predictions for production times, costs, and material comparisons.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If human experience is used for manufacturing predictions, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but prediction accuracy and consistency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces machine learning models as an intermediary between human experience and manufacturing predictions. The system trains ML models on historical manufacturing data, allowing the models to capture complex patterns and relationships that human estimators cannot consistently identify, thereby improving prediction accuracy while maintaining the flexibility of human oversight through model retraining and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If human experience is used for manufacturing predictions, then individual judgment is preserved, but consistency across different estimators deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual judgmentVSAvoidconsistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates standardized prediction models that copy and codify best practices from experienced estimators into reusable algorithms. Once a model is trained on historical data representing expert knowledge, it can be consistently applied across different products and estimators, eliminating variability while preserving the essence of human expertise through the trained model parameters and decision rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Device complexity

If traditional estimation methods are used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but optimization capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidoptimization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-training machine learning models on extensive historical manufacturing data before actual production planning. This upfront training phase captures lessons learned from past projects, enabling the models to provide optimized predictions for future manufacturing tasks without requiring complex real-time calculations or manual optimization processes during production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of information

If manual estimation processes are used, then process transparency is maintained, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess transparencyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where actual manufacturing outcomes are continuously fed back into the training data set, allowing models to learn from real performance data and improve over time. This creates a transparent loop where predictions can be validated against actual results, and the system adapts to maintain or improve accuracy while reducing time consumption as the models become more sophisticated through continuous learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11086292B2Methods and apparatus for machine learning predictions of manufacturing processes
Publication Date: 2021.08.10 XOMETRY INC
  • US11086292B2 patent drawing
  • US11086292B2 patent drawing
  • US11086292B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The subject technology is related to methods and apparatus for training a set of regression machine learning models with a training set to produce a set of predictive values for a pending manufacturing request, the training set including data extracted from a set of manufacturing transactions submitted by a set of entities of a supply chain. A multi-objective optimization model is implemented to (1) receive an input including the set of predictive values and a set of features of a physical object, and (2) generate an output with a set of attributes associated with a manufacture of the physical object in response to receiving the input, the output complying with a multi-objective condition satisfied in the multi-objective optimization model.