Multi-Station Manufacturing Control With Predictive Quality Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manufacturing processes often rely on human operators for assembly tasks due to challenges in automating low-quantity production runs, leading to inconsistencies in final product quality and inefficiencies in quality control, as robotic systems are costly and difficult to deploy for such scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A manufacturing system comprising multiple stations, a monitoring platform, and a control module that uses image data and machine learning to predict final quality metrics, dynamically adjusting processing parameters and generating updated instructions for downstream stations to correct errors and ensure desired quality standards, thereby automating quality control and improving process efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If human operators are used for assembly tasks, then flexibility in low-quantity production is maintained, but quality consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in low-quantity productionVSAvoidquality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human operators with an automated vision-guided system that uses machine learning models to predict quality metrics and control modules to adjust processing parameters. This substitution maintains flexibility in low-quantity production while improving quality consistency by eliminating human variability in assembly tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-correction by using the machine learning model to predict quality metrics and the control module to automatically adjust processing parameters in real-time. This closed-loop self-service mechanism ensures quality consistency without requiring human intervention, while maintaining adaptability to different production volumes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If robotic systems are deployed for automation, then productivity increases, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the automation system into three functional modules: a monitoring platform with image capture devices, a control module for parameter adjustment, and a machine learning model for quality prediction. This segmentation allows the system to achieve robotic-level productivity while managing complexity through modular design, enabling deployment in low-quantity production scenarios where full robotic automation would be overly complex and costly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If standard process control is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidquality metric accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the machine learning model continuously predicts quality metrics based on real-time image data from the monitoring platform. The control module uses this feedback to automatically adjust processing parameters, maintaining ease of operation while achieving high measurement precision through data-driven quality assessment and adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12153401B2Systems, methods, and media for manufacturing processes
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 NANOTRONICS IMAGING INC
  • US12153401B2 patent drawing
  • US12153401B2 patent drawing
  • US12153401B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A manufacturing system is disclosed herein. The manufacturing system includes one or more stations, a monitoring platform, and a control module. Each station of the one or more stations is configured to perform at least one step in a multi-step manufacturing process for a component. The monitoring platform is configured to monitor progression of the component throughout the multi-step manufacturing process. The control module is configured to dynamically adjust processing parameters of each step of the multi-step manufacturing process to achieve a desired final quality metric for the component.