Map-Based Scenario Annotation for Autonomous Path Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicle navigation systems face challenges in providing accurate self-navigation decisions due to incomplete perception and reliability issues with neural networks, and existing training datasets are inadequate for handling all possible scenarios, leading to misbehavior in unknown environments.

Innovation Solution

The method involves augmenting training sets with synthetically modified scenarios, including path altering and non-altering objects, to enhance the autonomous driving model's ability to navigate by modifying existing driving scenarios with synthetic objects, thereby improving the model's decision-making capabilities and adaptability to new environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing training datasets are used for autonomous driving models, then the model can be trained with available data, but the model exhibits misbehavior in unknown environments due to inadequate scenario coverage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to unknown environmentsVSAvoidreliability of navigation decisions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-modifying training scenarios to include diverse synthetic objects and path alterations before the model is deployed. This prepares the model in advance for unknown environmental conditions by exposing it to varied synthetic scenarios during training, thereby improving adaptability while maintaining reliability through comprehensive pre-training coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying scenario parameters such as object types, positions, and path alterations in the training data. By changing these parameters to create diverse synthetic scenarios, the model learns to handle a broader range of conditions, improving both adaptability to unknown environments and reliability of decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual algorithm development is used to handle all possible scenarios, then comprehensive scenario coverage can be achieved, but the system complexity and development time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of all possible scenariosVSAvoidcomplexity of algorithm development
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies copying by creating synthetic copies of real driving scenarios with modified parameters. Instead of manually developing algorithms for each possible scenario, the system copies existing scenarios and introduces synthetic variations, thereby achieving comprehensive scenario coverage while significantly reducing development complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality by creating a unified training framework that handles diverse scenarios through a single system. The synthetic object introduction mechanism and automated scenario modification approach provide multi-functional capability to cover various driving conditions without requiring separate manual algorithms for each scenario type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12110035B2Map based annotation for autonomous movement models training
Publication Date: 2024.10.08 IMAGRY ISRAEL LTD
  • US12110035B2 patent drawing
  • US12110035B2 patent drawing
  • US12110035B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, an apparatus and a computer program product for enhancing training of autonomous movement models based on map-based annotations. The method comprises augmenting an original training set with map based annotated modified scenarios at least one of which affects a path and at least one of which does not affect a path. The method comprises generating modified driving scenarios introducing a synthetic path altering object into the functional map representing the original movement or driving scenario, that induces a driving path that is different than the original path; and other modified driving scenarios that introduce a path non-altering object into the functional map of the original scenario, that the original path is applicable therein. An autonomous driving model for predicting driving path within a road segment based on a functional map representation is trained using the modified driving scenarios.