Map Element Certification for Automated Driving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The use of vehicle-externally created digital maps for safety-critical automated driving functions is problematic due to potential errors and inaccuracies that can lead to hazardous traffic situations, as these maps may contain errors during creation.

Innovation Solution

A method for certifying map elements by a control unit or server unit, where observation variables from mapping steps are monitored and compared to setpoint values, ensuring accurate map creation through graph modeling and validation, and a certificate is issued only if the map elements meet predefined accuracy and quality standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If digital maps are created vehicle-externally using higher computing power, then processing capability and data volume are improved, but reliability and accuracy deteriorate due to potential errors and inaccuracies in map creation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing powerVSAvoidmap accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing comprehensive validation of map elements before they are used in automated driving functions. The control unit checks observation variables (position, orientation, accuracy) against setpoint values and only accepts map elements that meet predefined accuracy standards, thereby preventing erroneous maps from compromising safety while utilizing the computational benefits of external map creation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If map elements are validated through multiple monitoring steps, then reliability and accuracy are improved, but device complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap element validityVSAvoidvalidation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the validation process into distinct monitoring steps, each validating specific observation variables (position accuracy, orientation accuracy, etc.) separately. This modular approach makes the complex validation process manageable and systematic, with each step focusing on a specific aspect of map element quality while maintaining overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the control unit continuously monitors observation variables against setpoint values and adjusts the validation process accordingly. If map elements fail to meet accuracy standards, the system provides feedback to reject them, ensuring that only validated map elements proceed to automated driving functions, thereby maintaining high reliability despite the complexity of the validation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If strict accuracy standards are enforced for map elements, then safety and reliability are improved, but productivity and map creation speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety-critical accuracyVSAvoidmap creation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by establishing and communicating predefined accuracy standards and setpoint values before the map creation process begins. This allows mapping vehicles to target specific accuracy levels during data collection and processing, enabling efficient validation while maintaining safety-critical accuracy standards, thus balancing productivity with reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11828605B2Certification of map elements for automated driving functions
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11828605B2 patent drawing
  • US11828605B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is described for the certification by a control unit of map elements for safety-critical driving functions. At least one observation variable of at least one mapping step of at least one map element is ascertained after an implementation of the mapping step via a monitoring function and is compared with a setpoint value of the observation variable. At least one result value is calculated based on a comparison of the observation variable with the setpoint value of the observation variable for the at least one mapping step via the monitoring function. The at least one result value is stored as a certificate and is linked to the at least one map element. A control unit, a computer program and a machine-readable memory medium are also described.