System and method for map-interpolation based control of ejectors in an ejector refrigeration circuit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for ejector refrigeration circuits face efficiency losses due to reverse flow, which reduces compressor efficiency and energy usage.

Innovation Solution

A map-interpolation based control system for ejectors, where a controller generates maps based on predefined conditions and temperatures, predicts the opening percentage of each ejector through interpolation, and adjusts it to optimize performance and prevent reverse flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing control systems dynamically control the ejectors, then the ejectors can operate in the refrigeration circuit, but reverse flow occurs causing large loss of compressor efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefrigeration system efficiencyVSAvoidcompressor efficiency loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary actions by generating multiple pre-calculated maps showing optimal ejector opening percentages for different heat rejecting heat exchanger temperatures and refrigerant flow rates. Before operating conditions cause reverse flow, the system has already determined the appropriate corrective ejector opening from the pre-generated maps, allowing preventive control rather than reactive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the heat rejecting heat exchanger temperature and refrigerant flow rate, compares current conditions against the pre-generated maps, and dynamically adjusts ejector opening percentages based on this feedback. This closed-loop control ensures the ejectors operate optimally across varying conditions while preventing reverse flow that would reduce compressor efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the high pressure fluid and outlet fluid flow back to the secondary low pressure inlet, then the ejector continues to operate, but a large loss of compressor efficiency results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejector continuous operationVSAvoidcompressor efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates multiple maps in advance that show the optimal opening percentage for each ejector under various operating conditions (different heat rejecting heat exchanger temperatures and refrigerant flow rates). These pre-calculated maps enable the control system to determine the correct ejector opening before reverse flow occurs, allowing continuous operation while preventing efficiency loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically changes the opening percentage parameter of the ejectors based on real-time monitoring of heat rejecting heat exchanger temperature and refrigerant flow rate. By adjusting this key parameter according to pre-generated maps, the system maintains optimal operation across varying conditions and prevents the high pressure and outlet fluids from flowing back to the secondary low pressure inlet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances machine performance by optimizing ejector operation, reducing energy consumption, and minimizing reverse flow, thereby improving overall compressor efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the ejectors improve efficiency in the refrigeration system by utilizing a high pressure to help compress a low pressure gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The ejectors include a primary high pressure inlet, a secondary low pressure inlet, and an outlet. When an ejector is used as part of the refrigeration system, the cooled refrigerant from the heat rejecting heat exchanger enters each of the ejectors at the high pressure inlet and is expanded to a lower pressure at the outlet of each of the ejectors.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEjector effect: Injector

Implementation Method 3

Each of the plurality of maps is associated with a corresponding temperature of a heat rejecting heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentEP4542141A1System and method for map-interpolation based control of ejectors in an ejector refrigeration circuit
Publication Date: 2025.04.23 CARRIER CORP
  • EP4542141A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4542141A1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4542141A1 patent drawingFigure 2A

AI summary

A system (101) for map-interpolation based control of ejectors (101) in an ejector refrigeration circuit includes a controller (104) coupled to each of the ejectors and adapted to generate maps (200, 200A, 200B, 200C) based on predefined conditions. The controller identifies a first map (200A) associated with a first temperature of a heat rejecting heat exchanger (105) and a second map (200B) associated with a second temperature of the heat rejecting heat exchanger. The controller predicts an opening percentage of the first ejector from at least one of opening percentages indicated in the first map and opening percentages indicated in the second map. Finally, the controller adjusts the opening percentage of the first ejector based on the predicted opening percentage.