Map-Based Listing Search Visual Distinction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network sites face challenges in efficiently processing complex queries for content, such as accommodations listings, leading to delays, inaccurate results, and high computational resource consumption.

Innovation Solution

A search and display system that visually distinguishes listings on a map-based GUI by location, allowing users to easily identify relevant listings within a specified geographical region, thereby reducing the need for additional search queries and computational resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If complex queries are processed to return accurate reservation listings, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to computational delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of search resultsVSAvoidcomputation delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-computing and caching search results based on historical query patterns and user behavior. When a query is received, the system checks for pre-computed results that match or closely approximate the current query parameters, returning these cached results to avoid full recomputation. This resolves the contradiction by providing accurate results (from pre-computed data) without the time penalty of real-time complex processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the search process into multiple stages: initial broad filtering, progressive refinement based on user interactions, and targeted detailed processing only for promising results. Instead of processing all listings with full query complexity simultaneously, the system divides the workload into manageable segments executed sequentially or in parallel, reducing overall computation time while maintaining result accuracy through iterative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If complex queries with multiple parameters are processed, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to computational resource consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of search resultsVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by processing only the most relevant query parameters with full complexity while using simplified processing for less critical parameters. For example, location and date parameters may receive full computational attention while secondary filters use lighter processing. This reduces overall device complexity and resource consumption while maintaining sufficient measurement precision for the most important search criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes processing parameters based on query characteristics, data distribution, and system load. Query parameters are transformed into optimized internal representations, and processing thresholds are adjusted based on historical performance. This allows the system to maintain high measurement precision when needed while reducing computational complexity under normal conditions or for less critical queries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If traditional list-based search results are displayed, then ease of operation is reduced due to difficulty in identifying location-based listings, but device complexity remains low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of identifying relevant listingsVSAvoidsystem complexity for map-based display
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from one-dimensional list-based display to two-dimensional map-based display, adding a spatial dimension to the search results interface. Listings are plotted on a map with visual markers indicating their locations, allowing users to intuitively understand geographical distribution and identify relevant listings based on visual proximity rather than scrolling through text lists. This dramatically improves ease of operation for location-based searches while the underlying system complexity remains manageable through standard mapping library integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12235836B2Representing listings for reservations on map
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 AIRBNB INC
  • US12235836B2 patent drawing
  • US12235836B2 patent drawing
  • US12235836B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system that enables searching for representing listings for accommodation reservations on a map is described. The system receives, by a network site of a listing network platform, input comprising search criteria associated with a geographical region and identifies a plurality of listings matching the search criteria. The system identifies a first subset listings of the plurality of listings that is each associated with a respective location that is within a boundary associated with the geographical region and a second subset listings of the plurality of listings that is each associated with a respective location that is outside the boundary associated with the geographical region. The system visually distinguishes the first subset of listings from the second subset of listings on a map-based graphical user interface (GUI) that represents the plurality of listings matching the search criteria.