Map Route Visual Disambiguation via Emphasized Polylines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current navigation systems do not effectively allow users to visually disambiguate multiple travel routes for a search term, making it difficult to select a point of interest without returning to a list of search results, as they lack sufficient information and clear differentiation between routes and roads.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for visual disambiguation that sends a map search request including a start location and search term to a map server, receives multiple routes, generates a multiple route style based on these routes and a road style, and simultaneously displays them on a user device, with emphasized route polylines and understated road polylines, along with start and end location labels, to facilitate route selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple routes are displayed simultaneously with emphasized routing polylines and understated road polylines, then route distinguishability is improved, but rendering complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute distinguishabilityVSAvoidrendering complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the visual properties of routing polylines from road polylines. Routing polylines are rendered with emphasized styles (thicker lines, distinct colors) while road polylines use understated styles, creating local visual differentiation that enhances route distinguishability without requiring complex global changes to the rendering system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes color changes and visual property modifications to distinguish routing polylines from road polylines. By applying different colors, line thicknesses, and visual emphasis to routing polylines versus road polylines, the system achieves clear route differentiation through visual property variation rather than complex rendering logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

2Measurement precision

If end location labels are favored over road labels to avoid intersections, then label clarity is improved, but information completeness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabel clarityVSAvoidinformation completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-planning label placement strategies before rendering. The system determines in advance which labels (end location labels versus road labels) should be favored and positioned to avoid intersections, rather than attempting to resolve conflicts during the rendering process. This proactive approach maintains label clarity while preserving information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by adjusting label positioning parameters and rendering priorities. When end location labels are favored over road labels, the system modifies positioning parameters to prevent intersections, dynamically adjusting label placement based on the chosen rendering priority without losing essential information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If travel time labels are included for each route, then information completeness is improved, but visual clutter increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidvisual clutter
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively displaying travel time labels for routes based on user needs and context. Rather than showing all possible information for every route simultaneously, the system provides travel time labels in a controlled manner, showing essential information while avoiding excessive visual clutter through selective information presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If users must return to search results list to select different points of interest, then navigation accuracy is improved, but user efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoiduser efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the route display functionality with the point of interest selection functionality into a single unified view. By simultaneously displaying multiple routes with their respective end location labels on the map, users can directly select different points of interest from the route overview without returning to a separate search results list, combining what were previously separate operations into one efficient workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9239246B2Method, system, and computer program product for visual disambiguation for directions queries
Publication Date: 2016.01.19 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9239246B2 patent drawing
  • US9239246B2 patent drawing
  • US9239246B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, computer programs, and user interfaces are provided to send a map search request including a start location and a search term to a map server, receive a number of routes, each of the routes describing a route from the start location to one of a number of potential destinations, receive a road style for rendering roads in a map extent encompassing the routes, and simultaneously display the routes based on a multiple route style.