Mapping Image Smoothing via Coefficient of Variation Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing methods for mapping images obtained by detecting signals from specimens require manual determination of smoothing conditions, which is time-consuming and prone to errors, leading to variations in image quality.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus and method that automatically determine the degree of smoothing based on the difference between maximum and minimum signal intensity values, using calculations such as the coefficient of variation and filter sizes, to perform smoothing processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If smoothing processing is performed on a mapping image using fixed conditions (wavelet transform, moving average filter), then the S/N ratio is improved, but image quality deteriorates depending on the image and user burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveS/N ratioVSAvoiduser burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines the optimal smoothing condition by calculating the coefficient of variation from the mapping image data itself, without requiring user intervention. The processor computes statistical parameters (mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation) and selects appropriate smoothing methods and conditions based on these calculated values, enabling the system to serve itself in determining processing parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts smoothing parameters based on the calculated coefficient of variation. When the coefficient of variation exceeds a threshold, stronger smoothing methods (wavelet transform, moving average filter) are applied; when it is below the threshold, minimal or no smoothing is applied. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by matching the smoothing intensity to the actual image characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the user manually determines the smoothing condition for each mapping image, then image quality can be optimized, but it takes much time and the user may fail to find the optimal condition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidtime for determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of user determination with an automated computational system. The processor calculates the coefficient of variation and automatically selects smoothing conditions based on predetermined thresholds, substituting human judgment and manual operation with algorithmic decision-making. This eliminates time loss while maintaining optimal image quality through objective, consistent criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the calculated coefficient of variation to automatically adjust smoothing conditions. The processor continuously evaluates the image data, computes statistical parameters, and uses this feedback to determine the appropriate smoothing method and intensity, creating a closed-loop system that optimizes image quality without user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If smoothing processing is applied to improve S/N ratio, then signal quality improves, but variations in determination of smoothing condition occur depending on the user

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidconsistency of smoothing condition
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes from subjective user-determined parameters to objective, calculated parameters. The coefficient of variation is computed from the actual image data, providing an objective measure of signal quality that consistently drives smoothing condition selection. This eliminates variations between different users while maintaining reliable signal quality improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal smoothing determination system that works consistently across different mapping images and users. By using the coefficient of variation as a universal metric and predetermined thresholds as universal decision criteria, the system achieves consistent results regardless of who operates it or what specific image is being processed, eliminating user-dependent variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10482579B2Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and analyzer
Publication Date: 2019.11.19 JEOL LTD
  • US10482579B2 patent drawing
  • US10482579B2 patent drawing
  • US10482579B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an image processing apparatus, which is configured to perform smoothing processing on a mapping image obtained by detecting a signal emitted from one of a plurality of analysis areas of a specimen. The image processing apparatus includes: a memory; and a processor configured to execute a program stored in the memory to perform: processing for calculating a difference between a maximum value and a minimum value of signal intensity data being intensity information on the signal of one of pixels within the mapping image, and determining a degree of smoothing to be used for the smoothing processing based on the difference; and processing for performing the smoothing processing based on the determined degree of smoothing.