Marine Bubble Source Signature Determination via Motion Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current marine seismic survey techniques face challenges in accurately determining the source signature of bubbles produced by impulsive sources, which affects the accuracy of seismic data acquisition and interpretation, especially due to deviations in depth, pressure, and subarray separations, and the inability to account for motion effects in near-field measurements.

Innovation Solution

The method involves estimating the position of bubbles as a function of time using a combination of receivers positioned to account for motion effects, allowing for improved modeling of notional source signatures by de-ghosting seismic data and using field measurements to correct for variations in recorded signatures, thereby enhancing the accuracy of seismic data processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional near-field measurements are used to determine source signature, then the measurement process is simple, but the accuracy of source signature determination deteriorates due to inability to account for motion effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesource signature determination accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by estimating bubble position as a function of time and using this dynamic position information to correct the source signature determination. Instead of assuming a static source position, the system continuously updates the bubble position based on its motion through the water column, thereby accounting for motion effects and improving measurement accuracy without requiring overly complex measurement equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational process that uses recorded signature variations and estimated bubble positions to derive corrected source signatures. This intermediary processing step acts as a mediator between the simple near-field measurements and the accurate source signature determination, resolving the contradiction by adding computational complexity rather than physical measurement complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If bubble position is not estimated, then the processing is simpler, but the accuracy of notional source signature modeling deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotional source signature accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by estimating bubble position as a function of time before using this information to determine the notional source signature. This preliminary position estimation allows the system to pre-correct for motion effects in the signature modeling process, improving accuracy while managing processing time through efficient sequential computation rather than iterative refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If motion effects are not accounted for, then the measurement process is simpler, but the reliability of seismic data deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseismic data reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by using recorded signature variations from multiple receivers to infer bubble position, and then using this position information to correct the source signature determination. This feedback loop continuously refines the position estimate and corresponding signature correction, improving seismic data reliability through iterative refinement rather than requiring complex real-time measurement systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach facilitates more accurate identification of far-field signatures and improves the stability and processing of seismic data by accounting for the motion of impulsive sources and receivers, leading to enhanced reservoir monitoring and hydrocarbon extraction capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

Each signal is essentially a wave called a wavefield that travels down through the water and into the subterranean formation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWave propagation: Sound

Implementation Method 2

a portion of the wavefield may be reflected, which may include some scattering, back toward the body of water to propagate toward the water surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

At each interface between different types of rock, a portion of the wavefield may be refracted

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 4

determination of a notional source signature of a bubble produced by actuation of an impulsive source in a marine seismic survey

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic signal generation: Sound

Data Source

PatentEP3566079B1Determining a notional source signature of a bubble
Publication Date: 2022.05.11 PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS
  • EP3566079B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3566079B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3566079B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A notional source signature of a bubble may be determined. For example, a method for determining a notional source signature of a bubble can include estimating a position of a bubble created by actuation of an impulsive marine source below a surface of water. A notional source signature of the bubble can be determined based on the estimate.