Marine Dock Suction Float Element Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional floating docks and walkways are unstable, prone to tipping in rough water or inclement weather, and difficult to reconfigure for different widths and configurations, posing safety and practicality issues.

Innovation Solution

A suction float element with a buoyant plastic shell filled with foam, featuring vertical recesses and suction pockets that engage with the water to enhance stability and allow for quick adjustment and reconfiguration, secured to a frame using connectors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional buoyant floats are used to support floating docks, then the dock can be easily installed and configured, but the dock exhibits poor stability and high risk of tipping in rough water or inclement weather

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedock stabilityVSAvoidtipping risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs hydraulic principles by utilizing suction pockets that create negative pressure (vacuum) when the float is pushed into the water. This suction effect creates a strong adhesive force between the float and water surface, significantly enhancing stability and preventing tipping in rough conditions. The suction pockets are positioned at the bottom of the float to maximize this hydraulic adhesion effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical state of the float-water interaction by transitioning from simple buoyancy to active suction adhesion. The suction pockets alter the pressure parameter at the water interface, creating a vacuum state that generates strong holding force. This parameter change transforms the float from passively floating to actively gripping the water surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional floats are used, then the basic floating function is achieved, but they are tedious and time-consuming to disassemble, rearrange and reconfigure for different dock configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereconfigurabilityVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The float is divided into modular components including the main float body, suction pockets, and detachable connectors. This segmentation allows individual floats to be easily separated and reconfigured for different dock widths and layouts. The modular design enables quick assembly and disassembly without requiring complex tools or procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The float design incorporates dynamic adjustability through movable connectors and reconfigurable mounting options. The connectors can be quickly attached and detached, allowing the dock configuration to be dynamically changed in response to different usage requirements or environmental conditions, significantly reducing reconfiguration time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If conventional floats are used, then the dock structure is simple, but the freeboard is higher and less stable in varying water conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefreeboard stabilityVSAvoidfloat structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suction pockets create a hydraulic bond with the water surface, allowing the float to maintain a lower, more stable freeboard position. The suction effect generates downward adhesive force that counteracts wave action and stabilizes the float's vertical position, reducing excessive freeboard movement in varying water conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The float incorporates composite construction combining buoyant materials with suction-generating structures. This composite design integrates the buoyancy function with the suction adhesion function, achieving both stability and lower freeboard without significantly increasing overall structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The suction float element significantly reduces the risk of tipping and provides stable support in varying water conditions, enabling secure and versatile use of floating docks and walkways with improved stability and reduced freeboard.

Implementation Method 1

an exterior shell composed of plastic or other buoyant material and filled with a buoyant foam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

when a load is applied to the dock or walkway, the buoyancy of the float element produces suction within the suction pockets, which causes the float element to be gripped by the underlying water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS20230304246A1Marine Dock Suction Float Element
Publication Date: 2023.09.28 GOLDEN WILLIAM
  • US20230304246A1 patent drawing
  • US20230304246A1 patent drawing
  • US20230304246A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A floating marine dock employs a plurality of spaced-apart suction float elements. Each element includes a foam filled plastic shell having a plurality of suction pockets that extend vertically upwardly through and beyond a bottom wall section of the shell to an upper end within the shell. When a load is placed on the dock or walkway, the buoyant float element produces a low pressure or vacuum space within each pocket and a resultant suction that forcefully adheres the float elements and dock securely to the underlying water