Autonomous Marine Docking Using Harbor Track Setpoint Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies lack an efficient and reliable method for autonomous marine vessel maneuvering, particularly for safe and precise docking and undocking processes.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and apparatus for autonomous marine vessel docking, which includes determining transit and docking control modes based on route plan and harbor track data, using sensors for location and heading information, and controlling thrusters through a closed-loop controller to align the vessel with dynamic setpoints, enabling precise navigation and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If autonomous docking control mode is implemented, then docking precision and safety are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocking precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous docking system is segmented into distinct operational modes (transit control mode and autonomous docking control mode) with clear transition criteria. This segmentation allows the complex docking task to be divided into manageable phases, each with specific control algorithms and sensor requirements, thereby improving docking precision while making the overall system complexity more controllable through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining approach zone information including location area, maximum vessel speed, and maximum heading deviation before actual docking occurs. This preliminary configuration allows the vessel to prepare for docking in advance, ensuring precise alignment and speed control while simplifying the real-time control complexity through pre-calculated parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If dynamic setpoint control with closed loop controller is used, then vessel positioning accuracy is improved, but control algorithm complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevessel positioning accuracyVSAvoidcontrol algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closed loop controller continuously monitors vessel position, speed, and heading, comparing actual values against dynamic setpoints derived from harbor track data. This feedback mechanism maintains high positioning accuracy by constantly adjusting control inputs based on measured deviations, while the systematic feedback structure keeps algorithm complexity manageable through established control theory frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic setpoints for position, speed, and heading that change continuously based on the vessel's location along the harbor track. This dynamic adaptation allows the control system to maintain optimal positioning accuracy throughout the docking maneuver, with the setpoints being interpolated between waypoints to provide smooth, continuous guidance while avoiding the need for complex discontinuous control switches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If mode transition criteria are strictly enforced, then docking safety is improved, but operational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocking safetyVSAvoiddocking time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessments of transition criteria (location, speed, heading) before mode transitions occur. By pre-evaluating whether the vessel meets the requirements for switching from transit to autonomous docking mode, the system ensures safety is maintained while minimizing unnecessary delays. The criteria are checked systematically but efficiently, allowing rapid decision-making on mode transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The transition between control modes is achieved by changing key operational parameters (control mode flag, setpoint generation method, thruster control strategy) rather than through complex procedural changes. This parameter-based approach maintains docking safety through strict criterion enforcement while reducing docking time by enabling smooth, rapid transitions between well-defined operational states with clearly specified parameter sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11691703B2Method, device and apparatus for autonomous docking of marine vessel
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 WARTSILA SAM ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US11691703B2 patent drawing
  • US11691703B2 patent drawing
  • US11691703B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and computer-implemented method for autonomous marine vessel docking, the method including determining a transit control mode associated with route plan data defining transit operation between ports; determining an autonomous docking control mode associated with harbor track data including a set of waypoint properties and defining approach zone information and track segments joined at waypoints. Method further includes determining vessel location, speed and heading; comparing the vessel location, speed and heading to the approach zone information and changing from the transit control mode to the autonomous docking control mode in response to: the vessel location included by the location area information; the vessel speed being lower than the maximum vessel speed for entering the approach zone; and the vessel heading matching criteria defined by the maximum heading deviation for entering the approach zone.