Marine Vessel Low-Speed Propulsion Control Without Vessel-Specific Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for controlling low-speed propulsion of marine vessels require labor-intensive vessel-specific calibration and maintenance of hundreds of unique configurations, leading to performance variations across a fleet due to human factors and personal preferences.

Innovation Solution

A model-based control system that correlates joystick commands with inertial velocity values, using a command model to determine desired inertial velocities and a vessel dynamics model to calculate surge, sway, and yaw commands, eliminating the need for vessel configuration-specific calibration and allowing unified control across various vessel configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If vessel-specific calibration is performed manually for each configuration, then control accuracy for that specific vessel is improved, but device complexity and time required for setup increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidcalibration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a digital model (copy) of the vessel's propulsion system configuration, including propulsion device locations, thrust vector capabilities, and vessel dynamics parameters. This digital twin allows the control algorithm to simulate and calculate optimal thrust distributions without requiring physical calibration trials, thereby maintaining control accuracy while eliminating the need for repeated on-water testing for different configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts control parameters based on the specific vessel configuration by inputting key parameters such as propulsion device locations, thrust capacities, and vessel mass properties into the control algorithm. This parameter-driven approach enables the system to adapt to different vessel configurations through software configuration rather than physical recalibration, reducing both complexity and time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple unique configurations are maintained for different vessels, then control accuracy for each vessel is improved, but loss of time for maintenance and updates increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system implements a universal algorithm that can handle multiple vessel configurations through a single unified software platform. The system accepts various input parameters describing different propulsion arrangements (azimuth pods, fixed propellers, hybrid configurations) and automatically calculates appropriate thrust distributions. This multi-functional capability eliminates the need to maintain separate calibration data for each vessel type, significantly reducing maintenance time while preserving control accuracy across the fleet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If human operators perform calibration and customization, then adaptability to specific vessel characteristics is improved, but reliability decreases due to human factors and personal preferences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevessel-specific adaptabilityVSAvoidperformance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-calibration by allowing operators to input basic vessel parameters (propulsion device locations, thrust capacities, vessel mass) and having the control algorithm automatically calculate and optimize thrust distributions. This eliminates human judgment and personal preferences from the calibration process, ensuring consistent, repeatable results across different operators and vessels while maintaining full adaptability to specific vessel configurations through the automated calculation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If extensive on-water testing is conducted for vessel personality development, then control performance is improved, but loss of time and resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol performanceVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations and optimizations offline using the digital model of the vessel configuration. The control algorithm pre-calculates optimal thrust distributions for various operating conditions based on the input vessel parameters, creating a lookup table or stored solution set. This preliminary action eliminates the need for extensive on-water testing to develop vessel personality, as the optimal control strategies are already determined before the vessel deploys, significantly reducing testing time and resources while maintaining high control performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12084160B2Methods and systems for controlling low-speed propulsion of a marine vessel
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 BRUNSWICK CORP
  • US12084160B2 patent drawing
  • US12084160B2 patent drawing
  • US12084160B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling low-speed propulsion of a marine vessel powered by a marine propulsion system having a plurality of propulsion devices includes receiving a signal indicating a position of a manually operable input device movable to indicate desired vessel movement within three degrees of freedom, and associating the position of the manually operable input device with a desired inertial velocity of the marine vessel. A steering position command and an engine command are then determined for each of the plurality of propulsion devices based on the desired inertial velocity and the propulsion system is controlled accordingly. An actual velocity of the marine vessel is measured and a difference between the desired inertial velocity and the actual velocity is determined, where the difference is used as feedback in subsequent steering position command and engine command determinations.