Marine Propulsion Device Control for Fuel Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Marine vessels often operate at idle or low speed conditions for extended periods, where only a fraction of the available power is required, leading to inefficient use of propulsion devices and increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that selectively turns off one or more propulsion devices during idle or light load conditions, adjusting the steering and propulsion behavior of the remaining devices to maintain equivalent run-time hours and reduce maintenance, while allowing for activation or deactivation via a user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all propulsion devices are operated continuously, then the vessel has sufficient power and thrust availability, but the maintenance costs increase and fuel efficiency decreases during low load conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower availabilityVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts or removes certain propulsion devices from operation when their contribution to the total thrust is minimal. The control module identifies and deactivates specific propulsion devices based on calculated thrust requirements, operating only the necessary subset of devices to meet the commanded thrust while leaving others idle or shut down, thereby reducing fuel consumption without compromising vessel propulsion needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of operating all propulsion devices at partial load (which is inefficient), the system applies partial action by activating only the minimum number of devices required to deliver the needed thrust. This approach is more efficient than running all devices at low efficiency points, as it concentrates power delivery on fewer devices operating at optimal load levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Power

If all propulsion devices are operated continuously, then sufficient thrust is available, but maintenance costs increase due to unequal run-time hours

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust availabilityVSAvoidmaintenance scheduling
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action by cyclically rotating which propulsion devices are active and which are idle. The control module monitors cumulative run-time hours for each device and periodically switches the operational status of devices to balance their usage. This ensures that no single device accumulates excessive wear while maintaining sufficient thrust availability through the coordinated operation of the active subset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter of propulsion devices from continuous operation to intermittent operation. By dynamically adjusting which devices are active based on thrust requirements and run-time hour accumulation, the system transforms the operational pattern to achieve both adequate power delivery and equitable distribution of wear across all devices, facilitating more uniform maintenance scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If a subset of propulsion devices is turned off, then fuel efficiency improves, but the system complexity increases due to control requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control module performs self-service by automatically calculating the optimal subset of propulsion devices to activate based on the commanded thrust and operational conditions. The system independently determines which devices should be active, adjusts their individual thrust contributions, and manages the rotational scheduling without requiring complex external control systems or manual intervention, thereby achieving fuel efficiency through intelligent autonomous decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the control module continuously monitors the operational status, thrust output, and cumulative run-time hours of each propulsion device. Based on this feedback, the control module dynamically adjusts which devices are active and how much thrust each should deliver, creating a closed-loop control system that optimizes fuel efficiency while maintaining adequate power availability and balancing device usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10048690B1Method and system for controlling two or more propulsion devices on a marine vessel
Publication Date: 2018.08.14 BRUNSWICK CORP
  • US10048690B1 patent drawing
  • US10048690B1 patent drawing
  • US10048690B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling two or more propulsion devices on a marine vessel includes receiving a vessel speed, determining that the vessel speed is below a first vessel speed threshold, receiving an operator thrust demand, and determining that the operator thrust demand is below a first demand threshold. At least one of the two or more propulsion devices is then turned off, and a thrust output of at least one remaining propulsion device is adjusted based on the operator thrust demand.