Marine Seismic Source Blending with Random Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Seismic data acquisition using blended sources faces challenges in separating individual seismic sources due to overlapping reflections, particularly in wide-azimuth towed streamer surveys, which complicates subsurface imaging and increases costs.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of multiple seismic sources activated at random times, with overlapping shots separated using an inversion-type process, allowing for faster and more cost-effective seismic surveys by making interference between sources incoherent while maintaining coherent reflections from each source.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple seismic sources are activated simultaneously or with overlapping timing to increase productivity, then the survey speed improves, but the difficulty of separating individual source reflections increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurvey speedVSAvoidsource separation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by using random time delays between source activations. Multiple seismic sources are activated in a periodic sequence with randomized timing intervals, allowing the sources to overlap in time while maintaining distinguishable patterns. This periodic activation with random timing enables faster survey acquisition while preserving the ability to separate individual source contributions through pattern recognition in the overlapping reflections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Measurement precision

If random time delays are introduced between source activations to make interference incoherent, then source separation becomes easier, but the complexity of the acquisition process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesource separation qualityVSAvoidacquisition process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the time delay parameter between source activations. Instead of using fixed or zero time delays, the system introduces random time delay values that change from one source activation sequence to another. This parameter variation transforms the coherent interference pattern into an incoherent one, making source separation easier while managing complexity through controlled randomness in the timing parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If conventional sequential source activation is used to maintain clear source separation, then measurement precision is maintained, but productivity decreases due to slower acquisition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesource separation qualityVSAvoidsurvey speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies merging by combining multiple seismic source activations within overlapping time windows. Instead of strictly sequential activation, the system merges the output of multiple sources that are activated with random time delays, allowing their reflections to overlap in the recorded data. This merging approach enables parallel processing of multiple sources, significantly increasing survey speed while the random timing patterns preserve source separation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables faster and cheaper seismic data acquisition, potentially providing better resolution and improving the chances of discovering economic hydrocarbon deposits by effectively separating overlapping seismic sources.

Implementation Method 1

The source of the down-going sound energy might come, for example, from explosions or seismic vibrators on land, or air guns in marine environments. Each time the source is activated, it generates a seismic signal that travels downward through the earth, is reflected, and, upon its return, is recorded at a great many locations on the surface.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSeismic reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

waiting a random length of time following the first seismic source activation and then activating the second seismic source where the random length of time is selected such that recorded seismic energy from said second source activation interferes with recorded seismic energy from the first source activation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Data Source

PatentEP2601543B1Method and apparatus for marine wide azimuth towed stream seismic acquisition
Publication Date: 2020.10.07 BP CORP NORTH AMERICA INC
  • EP2601543B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2601543B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2601543B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

This is a method of acquiring marine wide azimuth towed streamer seismic data. Preferably, a recording boat which tows a plurality of seismic streamers and at least one source may be accompanied by a plurality of source boats that each tow at least one source. The source boats may preferably activate their respective sources such that the subsurface reflections generated by each source interfere. The time separation between successive shots may preferably be a random variable related to the lowest frequency of interest in the data. Additionally, the source boats may preferably be alternatively fired from the head and tail of the recording streamers.