Marine Vessel Movable Control Unit for Deck Space Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing marine vessels face challenges in optimizing deck space utilization and maneuverability due to the fixed position of cabins and control panels, which affects stability and performance, especially when moving through water.

Innovation Solution

A marine vessel design featuring a cabin and control panel that can be moved longitudinally along the deck using rolling wheels and a drive unit, secured by a latching and locking system, allowing for flexible positioning to optimize space and weight distribution, thereby enhancing maneuverability and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the cabin and control panel are fixed in position on the vessel, then structural simplicity is maintained, but deck space utilization and maneuverability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeck space utilizationVSAvoidcabin positioning system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cabin and control panel are transformed from fixed to movable components through the implementation of rolling wheels and latching mechanisms. This dynamic positioning system allows the cabin to be relocated along the deck to optimize space utilization and weight distribution, directly resolving the contradiction between adaptability and structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The positioning system is divided into independent functional modules: rolling wheels for movement, latching mechanisms for securing, and drive units for propulsion. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently while maintaining overall system simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the cabin is positioned forward on the vessel, then control accessibility is improved, but bow rotation and reduced thrust efficiency occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accessibilityVSAvoidthrust efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The control panel's position is made adjustable rather than fixed, allowing operators to relocate it to optimal positions that balance accessibility with hydrodynamic efficiency. The panel can be moved forward for better control access or rearward to improve thrust efficiency, resolving the contradiction through dynamic repositioning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The position parameter of the control panel is made variable, enabling adjustment of its longitudinal location along the deck. This parameter change allows optimization of both control accessibility and thrust efficiency depending on operational requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If rolling wheels are added to enable cabin movement, then positioning flexibility is improved, but friction and resistance to movement increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecabin repositioning capabilityVSAvoidfriction force
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The manual sliding friction-based movement system is replaced with a rolling wheel mechanism. This substitution reduces friction forces significantly, as rolling friction is much lower than sliding friction, enabling easier and more efficient cabin repositioning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Rolling wheels act as intermediary elements between the cabin and the deck surface. These wheels mediate the interaction by converting sliding contact into rolling contact, thereby reducing friction and enabling smooth movement of the cabin along the deck

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Stability of the object's composition

If a latching system is implemented to secure the cabin, then position stability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecabin position stabilityVSAvoidlatching mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The latching mechanism is designed to automatically engage and secure the cabin when it reaches the desired position during movement. This self-service capability eliminates the need for complex manual latching operations or additional control systems, maintaining simplicity while ensuring position stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Complex mechanical latching systems are replaced with simpler friction-based or spring-loaded retaining mechanisms. These simplified systems provide sufficient stability for securing the cabin at various positions without requiring intricate mechanical components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables flexible repositioning of the cabin and control panel to maximize deck space and improve vessel stability and maneuverability by adjusting weight distribution, reducing the impact of forward weight on bow rotation and improving thrust efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The cabin or the deck in one example having a plurality of rolling wheels or other friction reducing components attached thereto; wherein the rolling wheels roll upon the deck or against the cabin and allow longitudinal movement of the cabin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction reduction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

The drive unit optionally mounted to the cabin or the deck and in one example having a drive wheel mounted to the drive unit and configured to rotate the drive wheel. The drive wheel(s) contacting the deck such that rotation of the drive wheel repositions the cabin longitudinally

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

each actuator has a pressure rod extending therefrom which secures the cabin in place or releases the cabin to move when the actuator is actuated in either direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS11021217B2Marine vessel with moving control unit
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 DAY THOMAS M
  • US11021217B2 patent drawing
  • US11021217B2 patent drawing
  • US11021217B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a marine vessel, with a control panel movably mounted to the vessel.