Marine Vessel Speed Optimization via Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies face challenges in optimizing the balance between fuel cost, emissions, and trip time for marine vessels, as the relationship between vessel speed, trip time, and fuel usage is non-intuitive and nonlinear, requiring a balance that is difficult to achieve with existing methods.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of edge computing and machine learning models that predict vessel speed and fuel consumption based on engine RPM and load, incorporating geographic and environmental factors, allowing for real-time optimization of trip time and cost while minimizing emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If vessel speed is increased to reduce trip time, then productivity improves, but fuel consumption and emissions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip timeVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts vessel speed based on real-time conditions (weather, traffic, vessel state) rather than maintaining a fixed speed. The machine learning model continuously optimizes speed profiles during the voyage, allowing the vessel to adapt its operational parameters to balance trip time and fuel consumption under varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (speed, engine RPM, propeller pitch) based on predicted outcomes from the machine learning model. By adjusting these parameters in response to environmental and operational conditions, the system optimizes the trade-off between productivity and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If vessel speed is increased to reduce trip time, then productivity improves, but emissions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip timeVSAvoidemissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback loop where the machine learning model continuously monitors actual emissions and operational data, compares them with predictions, and adjusts speed recommendations accordingly. This closed-loop control enables the system to optimize the balance between productivity and emissions reduction based on real-time performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Use of energy by moving object

If fuel consumption is reduced to lower cost and emissions, then energy efficiency improves, but trip time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidtrip time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary optimization by predicting the optimal speed profile before the vessel departs or during early stages of the voyage. The machine learning model uses historical data and environmental forecasts to pre-calculate speed recommendations that minimize fuel consumption while meeting delivery time constraints, allowing operators to plan ahead rather than reactively adjust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If machine learning models are implemented for real-time optimization, then operational efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcomputing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning system is segmented into modular components: data collection modules, prediction models, optimization algorithms, and user interface modules. This segmentation allows the complex system to be developed, deployed, and maintained in manageable parts, reducing the practical complexity despite the advanced functionality provided.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11200358B2Prediction, planning, and optimization of trip time, trip cost, and/or pollutant emission for a vehicle using machine learning
Publication Date: 2021.12.14 IOCURRENTS INC
  • US11200358B2 patent drawing
  • US11200358B2 patent drawing
  • US11200358B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of predicting, in real-time, a relationship between a vehicle's engine speed, trip time, cost, and fuel consumption, comprising: monitoring vehicle operation over time to acquiring data representing at least a vehicle location, a fuel consumption rate, and operating conditions; generating a predictive model relating the vehicle's engine speed, trip time, and fuel consumption; and receiving at least one constraint on the vehicle's engine speed, trip time, and fuel consumption, and automatically producing from at least one automated processor, based on the predictive model, a constrained output.