Mark Sheet Image Processing for Partial Fill Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional image processing systems struggle to accurately identify filled-in frames in mark sheets, especially when only a thin line or partial marks are present, leading to incorrect determination of frame fill status.

Innovation Solution

The image processing system generates a first image by removing boundary elements and a second image by removing small elements, identifies blank frames, and determines filled-in frames by identifying frames without corresponding blank frames within a specific distance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the conventional density-based method is used to determine frame fill status, then the system can process images quickly with simple calculations, but it fails to accurately identify frames with partial or thin line fills

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe fill status identification accuracyVSAvoidimage processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the frame identification process into distinct stages: extracting frame candidate regions from the image, calculating density values for these regions, and applying threshold-based classification. This segmentation allows the system to focus computational resources on relevant areas and improve accuracy without proportionally increasing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary density calculation step that processes frame candidate regions before final classification. By calculating average density values as an intermediate metric and comparing them against thresholds, the system bridges the gap between raw pixel data and fill status determination, improving accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system uses maximum density value within the frame, then processing is simple and fast, but it produces incorrect results when large areas are unfilled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe fill determination reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter used for fill determination from maximum density value to average density value within the frame. This parameter change fundamentally improves reliability by considering the overall fill status rather than being influenced by localized high-density regions, while the computational complexity remains comparable since both are statistical measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of taking maximum density values with a more sophisticated density distribution analysis. By substituting the simple max operation with average density calculation and threshold comparison, the system achieves more reliable results without requiring complex mechanical or physical measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If the system calculates average density of each pixel row and uses maximum value, then the algorithm is straightforward, but it cannot properly identify frames with thin line segments or check marks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepartial fill detection precisionVSAvoiddensity calculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by calculating density values only for frame candidate regions rather than processing the entire image. This selective approach improves precision for partial fill detection by concentrating computational effort on relevant areas, while the density calculation methodology itself remains relatively simple and straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified representation of frame regions through density calculation, effectively copying the essential fill information into a processed form that can be easily classified. This copying approach allows accurate detection of partial fills including thin lines and check marks without requiring complex analysis of the original pixel data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250078239A1Image processing system
Publication Date: 2025.03.06 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • US20250078239A1 patent drawing
  • US20250078239A1 patent drawing
  • US20250078239A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing system generates a first image by removing elements in contact with a boundary of a mark sheet area image from the mark sheet area image; generates a second image by removing from the first image elements whose area is equal to or smaller than a specific ratio (less than 1) of an area of an element having the largest area in the first image; identifies an element in the second image whose inside is not filled in as a blank frame; identifies, of elements within the mark sheet area image, an element whose position in a direction in which the frames are aligned with respect to the character string that represents an item is within a specific distance from the blank frame as a frame, and identifies a frame that has no corresponding blank frame as a filled-in frame, whose inside is filled in.