Dynamic Markdown Pricing for Inventory Depletion Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Online retailers face challenges in managing markdown pricing during the markdown phase, as uniform discounts can lead to premature depletion of inventory at one fulfillment center while leaving excess stock at another, resulting in lost revenue due to inefficient inventory management and high shipping costs across geographically dispersed centers.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that offers different discounted prices to different customer groups based on their price sensitivity and location, while dynamically allocating fulfillment centers to geographic regions to optimize inventory depletion and shipping costs, using a computing system that iteratively adjusts markdown prices and fulfillment center allocations to maximize profit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If uniform markdown discounts are offered across all fulfillment centers, then the pricing simplicity is maintained, but inventory depletion becomes unbalanced across different fulfillment centers leading to premature exhaustion at some centers and excess stock at others

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing simplicityVSAvoidinventory balance across fulfillment centers
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the customer base into different groups based on price sensitivity and assigns different markdown discounts to different segments. This allows the system to offer tailored pricing to different customer groups while managing inventory depletion across multiple fulfillment centers, resolving the contradiction between pricing simplicity and inventory balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different markdown discounts to different fulfillment centers based on their local inventory levels and demand characteristics. This local differentiation enables each fulfillment center to deplete inventory at appropriate rates, preventing both premature exhaustion and excess stock accumulation while maintaining overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If deep markdown discounts are offered to quickly deplete inventory, then the inventory depletion rate increases, but the revenue lost from excessive discounting increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory depletion rateVSAvoidrevenue loss from discounting
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pricing parameter by offering different markdown discounts to different customer segments rather than applying a uniform deep discount. This allows the system to maintain higher prices for less price-sensitive customers while using deeper discounts strategically for price-sensitive segments, thereby controlling revenue loss while achieving inventory depletion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by offering moderate markdown discounts to certain customer segments rather than uniform deep discounts to all customers. This selective approach depletes inventory at a controlled rate while preserving revenue from customers who are less sensitive to price changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of energy

If shallow markdown discounts are offered to preserve revenue, then the revenue is better maintained, but inventory remains in stock at the discontinuance date requiring costly salvage operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue preservationVSAvoidremaining inventory at discontinuance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments customers by price sensitivity and applies different markdown strategies to different segments. This ensures that inventory is depleted through sales to price-sensitive segments while maintaining higher prices for other segments, thereby preserving revenue while avoiding excess inventory at discontinuance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic pricing that adjusts markdown discounts based on inventory levels, customer segment behavior, and time to discontinuance. This dynamic approach allows the system to optimize the balance between revenue preservation and inventory depletion, preventing both premature exhaustion and excess stock situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Quantity of substance

If inventory is reallocated from one fulfillment center to another, then the inventory distribution becomes more balanced, but the shipping costs increase due to geographic distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory distribution balanceVSAvoidshipping costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent takes preliminary action by proactively managing inventory depletion rates at each fulfillment center through segmented pricing strategies. This prevents the need for reactive reallocation and long-distance shipping, as inventory is depleted at appropriate rates at each location before discontinuance, avoiding costly last-minute transfers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11410117B2System and method for controlling inventory depletion by offering different prices to different customers
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US11410117B2 patent drawing
  • US11410117B2 patent drawing
  • US11410117B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and other embodiments associated with controlling inventory depletion by offering different prices to different customers are described. In one embodiment, a method includes establishing first and second allocations of fulfillment centers to different geographic regions during a markdown phase. Different price schedules are determined for the orders to be fulfilled during the markdown phase based on the first and second allocations. A predicted profit is generated for the orders fulfilled under each of the different price schedules. A price schedule corresponding to the first allocation is selected as resulting in a greater predicted profit than another one of the different price schedules. A sale terminal is controlled to enact the selected price schedule during the markdown phase to cause fulfillment of the incoming orders according to the first allocation of the fulfillment centers.