Driving Direction Marker Imaging for Floor Hazard Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous driving technologies face challenges with high costs due to expensive LIDAR sensors, risk of overturning with near-infrared distance sensors, noise-related malfunctions with 3D cameras, and position tracking errors with map-based methods, which hinder the widespread adoption and safety of autonomous driving systems.

Innovation Solution

A driving apparatus and control method that uses a marker output unit to irradiate visible lasers or lights on the floor, an image acquisition unit to capture marker images, and a determination unit to assess risk factors such as obstacles and height differences, allowing the control unit to adjust the driving path to prevent collisions and overturns by comparing reference images with acquired images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If LIDAR sensors are used for obstacle detection, then detection precision is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive LIDAR sensors with a combination of inexpensive components: a marker emission unit (visible laser or light), an image acquisition unit (camera), and processing unit. This substitution uses low-cost, readily available components to achieve the same obstacle detection function, directly resolving the contradiction between detection precision and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Measurement precision

If near-infrared distance sensors are used for obstacle detection, then detection capability is improved, but response time increases causing overturning risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection capabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the near-infrared distance sensor with an optical imaging system (camera capturing marker images). The image acquisition and processing occurs in real-time as the marker is continuously illuminated and captured, providing immediate obstacle detection without the response delays characteristic of distance sensors, thus eliminating the overturning risk while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If 3D cameras are used for floor detection, then detection function is added, but system reliability decreases due to noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefloor detection functionVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a marker (artificial visual target) as an intermediary between the camera and the floor surface. This marker provides high-contrast, easily distinguishable features that eliminate the noise problems encountered with 3D camera-based floor detection. The marker's distinct appearance against the floor background enables reliable detection without the malfunction issues associated with noise in limited-area 3D imaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If map-based prohibited area methods are used for navigation, then path planning is improved, but position accuracy decreases due to tracking errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath planning capabilityVSAvoidposition tracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements real-time feedback by continuously capturing marker images and comparing them with reference images to detect obstacles and floor conditions. This active feedback mechanism provides immediate positional correction information, eliminating the cumulative tracking errors inherent in map-based methods. The system constantly updates its understanding of the environment through marker image analysis, ensuring accurate position maintenance without relying on pre-defined maps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables effective detection of floor environment hazards like open gratings or stairs, ensures operator safety by clearly indicating the driving direction, and prevents accidents by controlling the driving speed or stopping the vehicle when risk factors are detected.

Implementation Method 1

a marker output unit configured to irradiate a marker in a predetermined driving direction of the main body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emission: Light

Implementation Method 2

the marker output unit irradiates a visible laser or a light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 3

an image acquisition unit configured to acquire a marker image by imaging the marker which is irradiated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImage imaging: Photography

Data Source

PatentUS20240111296A1Driving apparatus and control method thereof
Publication Date: 2024.04.04 SYSTEM ENGINEERING MEGA SOLUTION CO LTD
  • US20240111296A1 patent drawing
  • US20240111296A1 patent drawing
  • US20240111296A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The inventive concept provides a driving apparatus. The driving apparatus includes a main body; a driving unit configured to provide a driving force so the main body may drive; a marker output unit configured to irradiate a marker in a predetermined driving direction of the main body; an image acquisition unit configured to acquire a marker image by imaging the marker which is irradiated; and a determination unit for determining whether a risk factor of the predetermined driving direction exists from the marker image which is acquired from the image acquisition unit.