Markerless Body Joint Tracking via 3D Cylindrical Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional real-time body joint tracking methods face challenges due to occlusion, ambiguity, lighting conditions, and dynamic objects, particularly in marker-based systems that require obtrusive devices and are costly, making them unsuitable for prolonged rehabilitation therapy.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize 3D cylindrical models initialized from 3D point cloud data to track body joints, employing a particle filter mechanism to obtain optimized motion trajectories based on direction angles and base coordinates, reducing noise from depth sensors and improving tracking accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If marker-based joint tracking methods are used, then tracking accuracy is improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint tracking accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the markers from the tracking system, transitioning from marker-based to markerless joint tracking. This eliminates the need for obtrusive devices while maintaining tracking functionality through direct analysis of body geometry from depth images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual 3D model (cylindrical representation) that copies and represents the actual body segments. This virtual model allows tracking without physical markers, replicating the essential geometric properties needed for accurate joint position estimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If marker-based joint tracking methods are used, then tracking accuracy is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to obtrusive devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint tracking accuracyVSAvoiduser comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes markers completely from the system, eliminating devices that subjects must wear. This extraction of unnecessary components directly improves ease of operation and user comfort while maintaining tracking capability through alternative methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If conventional markerless joint tracking is used, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to occlusion and ambiguity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser comfortVSAvoidjoint tracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the body into distinct cylindrical regions corresponding to different body parts (arms, legs, torso). This segmentation allows independent tracking of each segment, reducing ambiguity and improving precision even when parts of the body are occluded, as each segment can be tracked separately using its geometric properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the representation parameters from direct 2D image coordinates to 3D cylindrical model parameters (position, orientation, scale). This parameter transformation enables more robust tracking by incorporating depth information and geometric constraints, improving precision under varying lighting and occlusion conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If conventional markerless joint tracking is used, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates in challenging lighting and occlusion conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser comfortVSAvoidtracking consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from 2D image plane tracking to 3D space tracking using depth information and cylindrical models. By adding the depth dimension and using 3D geometric constraints, the system achieves more reliable tracking that is less sensitive to variations in lighting conditions and occlusions that primarily affect 2D image analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10980447B2System and method for tracking body joints
Publication Date: 2021.04.20 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US10980447B2 patent drawing
  • US10980447B2 patent drawing
  • US10980447B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Body joint tracking is applied in various industries and medical field. In body joint tracking, marker less devices plays an important role. However, the marker less devices are facing some challenges in providing optimal tracking due to occlusion, ambiguity, lighting conditions, dynamic objects etc. System and method of the present disclosure provides an optimized body joint tracking. Here, motion data pertaining to a first set of motion frames from a motion sensor are received. Further, the motion data are processed to obtain a plurality of 3 dimensional cylindrical models. Here, every cylindrical model among the plurality of 3 dimensional cylindrical model represents a body segment. The coefficients associated with the plurality of 3 dimensional cylindrical models are initialized to obtain a set of initialized cylindrical models. A set of dynamic coefficients associated with the initialized cylindrical models are utilized to track joint motion trajectories of a set of subsequent frames.